J
Jim Luedke
Thought I'd share something I discovered:
Let's say string S = "MyCell1", and MyCell1 is a valid range name.
Then of course, expression Range(S) returns the range.
Next, let's say string T = "MyCell2", and ditto.
Then, Range(S,T) returns a range comprising the two individual ranges.
Now, let's say string U = "S,T".
Then, expression Range(U) is equivalent to Range(S,T). Namely, it
returns the range comprising MyCell1 and MyCell2.
That seems kind of amazing.
For a param to "resolve into" into "secondary" or "inline" params
strikes me, offhand, as the kind of capability you occasionally find
in a scripting language that you can't get in a compiled language.
***
Let's say string S = "MyCell1", and MyCell1 is a valid range name.
Then of course, expression Range(S) returns the range.
Next, let's say string T = "MyCell2", and ditto.
Then, Range(S,T) returns a range comprising the two individual ranges.
Now, let's say string U = "S,T".
Then, expression Range(U) is equivalent to Range(S,T). Namely, it
returns the range comprising MyCell1 and MyCell2.
That seems kind of amazing.
For a param to "resolve into" into "secondary" or "inline" params
strikes me, offhand, as the kind of capability you occasionally find
in a scripting language that you can't get in a compiled language.
***