RAM Mhz compared to a four digit number?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Brian V
  • Start date Start date
B

Brian V

Hi. I am looking at different RAMS to upgrade and pput in my pc.

On crucial.com it said I can use: "Each memory slot can hold DDR2
PC2-8500,DDR2 PC2-6400,DDR2 PC2-5300 with a maximum of 1GB per slot".

Some RAM I'v looked at uses MHz. Eg: Buffalo 2GB DDR2 667MHz 240-Pin
Computer Memory.

So, my question is: Can I use the MHz 240-Pin RAM's, or is this a different
kind of chip? Ot has the DDR2 and 240-PinI would assume they are the same but
how do I understand the DDR2 PC2-8500, 6400 or 5300 numbers in MHz. Is there
a conversion?

What is the difference in this situation between 8500, 6400 and 5300? I
would assume speed or something. I have looked in some stores and most said
5300 and other numbers on the tags, or I found the MHz numbers. I have yet to
find any 8500 or 6400.

Most people have said a 2GB piece would/may work in the slots if I tried.
But I just want to confirm it can. I would trust what Crucial.com says as
that site has been highly recommended on this forum to me often.
 
Before you fry anymore circuits :)
(Teasing you here.)
To to http://www.oempcworld.com
and check their site
you can drill down to your specific Machine
it will list exactly what memory chips your computer/mother board will take.

Now that you have that knowledge you can compare.
Just remember to keep the same SPEED Mhz of each chip for best performance.

If you still have questions
Report back with what OemPcworld.com says you need and what chips you have
and what you want to upgrade to
Russ

--
Russell Grover - SBITS.Biz [SBS-MVP]
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
Microsoft Certified Small Business Specialist
24hr SBS Remote Support - http://www.SBITS.Biz
Microsoft Online Services - http://www.microsoft-online-services.com
 
Brian said:
Hi. I am looking at different RAMS to upgrade and pput in my pc.

On crucial.com it said I can use: "Each memory slot can hold DDR2
PC2-8500,DDR2 PC2-6400,DDR2 PC2-5300 with a maximum of 1GB per slot".

Some RAM I'v looked at uses MHz. Eg: Buffalo 2GB DDR2 667MHz 240-Pin
Computer Memory.

So, my question is: Can I use the MHz 240-Pin RAM's, or is this a
different kind of chip? Ot has the DDR2 and 240-PinI would assume
they are the same but how do I understand the DDR2 PC2-8500, 6400 or
5300 numbers in MHz. Is there a conversion?

What is the difference in this situation between 8500, 6400 and 5300?
I would assume speed or something. I have looked in some stores and
most said 5300 and other numbers on the tags, or I found the MHz
numbers. I have yet to find any 8500 or 6400.

Most people have said a 2GB piece would/may work in the slots if I
tried. But I just want to confirm it can. I would trust what
Crucial.com says as that site has been highly recommended on this
forum to me often.

What is the make and model of your PC?

This article has the information you're looking for:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DDR2_SDRAM

You will see that 667MHZ Buffalo RAM is actually a "PC2-5300" module.

FWIW, a PC2-8500 module would correspond to 1066MHz (or DDR2-1066).

Question:

Do you plan on using this PC for Vista or 7? The reason that I ask is
that 512MB of RAM is usually enough for most XP users. It's only when
someone uses memory-intensive programs (like ones that do image or video
editing) that a user needs to use lots of RAM in XP.

These methods will help you determine whether or not you currently have
enough RAM (the trick is that you don't want to have to rely on your
hard drive's pagefile):

A quick way to determine if this is happening is to open Task Manager
(Ctrl+Alt+Del) and click the Performance tab. Then note the three values
under Commit Charge (K): in the lower left-hand corner: Total, Limit,
and Peak.

The Total figure represents the amount of memory you are using at that
very moment. The Peak figure represents the highest amount of memory you
used since last bootup. If both these figures are below the value of
Physical Memory (K) Total, then you probably have plenty of RAM.
In case you want to explore this further, you may run Page File Monitor
for Windows XP:

http://www.dougknox.com/xp/utils/xp_pagefilemon.htm
 
Brian said:
Hi. I am looking at different RAMS to upgrade and pput in my pc.

On crucial.com it said I can use: "Each memory slot can hold DDR2
PC2-8500,DDR2 PC2-6400,DDR2 PC2-5300 with a maximum of 1GB per slot".

Some RAM I'v looked at uses MHz. Eg: Buffalo 2GB DDR2 667MHz 240-Pin
Computer Memory.

So, my question is: Can I use the MHz 240-Pin RAM's, or is this a different
kind of chip? Ot has the DDR2 and 240-PinI would assume they are the same but
how do I understand the DDR2 PC2-8500, 6400 or 5300 numbers in MHz. Is there
a conversion?

What is the difference in this situation between 8500, 6400 and 5300? I
would assume speed or something. I have looked in some stores and most said
5300 and other numbers on the tags, or I found the MHz numbers. I have yet to
find any 8500 or 6400.

Most people have said a 2GB piece would/may work in the slots if I tried.
But I just want to confirm it can. I would trust what Crucial.com says as
that site has been highly recommended on this forum to me often.

There is a nice table here, relating MHz to Bandwidth.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DDR2_SDRAM

DDR2-1066 means the bus is transferring data 1066 million times per second.
Since the DIMM is 8 bytes wide, the bandwidth is 1066*8 = 8500MB/sec, so they
call that PC2-8500. There is a fixed relation between the numbers, and
the numbers can be used interchangeably in certain situations.

A PC2-8500 stick, can operate at DDR2-1066, DDR2-800, DDR2-667, DDR2-533
and probably even DDR2-400. There is eventually a lower limit to the
operating speed, but you likely won't find it while playing with the
computer. That means the PC2-8500 stick is a "universal donor" in a
sense. Faster memory can be used with slower systems is a general
rule of thumb, which is why Crucial has named a number of different
options for you.

Based on your previous question, you're likely asking about your
Acer E380 with Geforce 6100 based motherboard.

http://www.crucial.com/store/listparts.aspx?model=Aspire E380

A near-equivalent, might be this Asus M2N-MX motherboard.

http://dlcdnet.asus.com/pub/ASUS/mb/socketAM2/M2N-MX/e3548_M2N-MX.zip

The QVL for that board, shows them using DDR2-533, DDR2-667, DDR2-800.
So it is possible you could benefit from RAM at PC2-6400 or PC2-8500,
with the PC2-8500 stick running at PC2-6400 when the BIOS sets it up.
Tbe stock BIOS would likely choose DDR2-800 as the fastest operating
choice. The processor has the memory interface, so the details are
not related to limitations of the chipset, but to the processor type.
(In other words, if you wanted to understand the limits, the
documentation would be on the AMD.com site, if you could find
it there.)

ftp://ftp.asus.com/pub/asus/mb/socketAM2/M2N-MX/M2N-MX_QVL.zip

If you're mixing your old memory with new memory, then the BIOS
picks the slowest conditions to make all the RAM work. If you
had DDR2-667 in the machine already, and installed something
capable of running DDR2-800 (such as PC2-6400 or PC2-8500), the
BIOS would still choose DDR2-667. If you then unplug the DDR2-667
memory, the BIOS should then change to DDR2-800. To verify the
behavior, given that the Acer BIOS is likely brain-dead and
not doesn't have good BIOS screens, you can use CPUZ to display
the current operating conditions. This is one way to learn about
how your machine is currently running.

http://www.cpuid.com/cpuz.php

*******

You may notice in the Crucial list, these two memories.

DDR2 PC2-8500 • CL=7
DDR2 PC2-8500 • 5-5-5-15

The first number on the "5-5-5-15" thing is CAS latency in clock ticks.
The "CL=7" means CAS latency is 7 clock ticks. Notice that the
CAS 7 kit is $62 and the CAS 5 kit is $93.

That means lower CAS is better. CAS is the delay from when you
request the data, until read data shows up on the bus. But again,
there is no point buying "muscle car memory" if you're mixing it
with your existing memory. Both the memory bus speed (DDR2-800)
and CAS (CAS 7) are adjusted for the slowest of all the memories
plugged in. If the old memory was DDR2-667 and CAS 7, then a CAS 5
stick would end up operating at CAS 7 like its partners. The memories
tend to share the same settings, because that makes the memory
controller design easier.

*******

Another thing to consider when buying memory, is the clearance between
the slots, and whether the modules have heat spreaders or not. Some
of the Crucial sticks have no heat spreaders on them, and have raw
memory chips.

All memory chips dissipate the same amount of heat, so "spreading"
the heat isn't absolutely necessary (not like RDRAM, where you could
have hot spots). But the metal plate still serves as a heat sink
(effectiveness proportional to surface area).

Now, on the one hand, you might think the heat spreader is doing you
a favor. If you have two sticks next to one another in the computer,
there is good air flow over one surface of each stick. If you sandwich
four sticks in close proximity, all with heat spreaders, then the middle
sticks get no good airflow. If the sticks had no heat spreaders, and
you had four of them, there is a tiny air channel between each stick.

That tiny air channel is likely only of value in a forced air scenario,
where there is "spill air" coming off the CPU fan, to help cool the
memory. The cooling might actually be better on a four stick config,
if there weren't any heat spreaders. It is kind of a toss-up, as to
which is the better investment.

All I can tell you, is the last four sticks of DDR2 I bought, had no
spreaders. Spreaders generally go with the "muscle car memory", so
they're practically unavoidable if you select a premium memory with
either a high DDR2-xxxx number or a memory with a low CAS latency.
When an enthusiast buys a premium memory, they likely run them
at elevated voltage, and the operating temperature soars. But an
enthusiast would likely only populate two of the memory slots, as
that helps allow higher overclocks on the memory. So in that situation,
a heat spreader is ideal. Some people operate their memory in such
extreme conditions, that they install a fan above the memory array.
There are even companies that make memory cooler systems for such
enthusiasts.

But on an Acer, running at stock speeds and using 1.8V for the DIMMs,
I don't see a strong need for spreaders.

Paul
 
Brian V said:
Hi. I am looking at different RAMS to upgrade and pput in my pc.

On crucial.com it said I can use: "Each memory slot can hold DDR2
PC2-8500,DDR2 PC2-6400,DDR2 PC2-5300 with a maximum of 1GB per slot".

Some RAM I'v looked at uses MHz. Eg: Buffalo 2GB DDR2 667MHz 240-Pin
Computer Memory.

So, my question is: Can I use the MHz 240-Pin RAM's, or is this a
different
kind of chip? Ot has the DDR2 and 240-PinI would assume they are the same
but
how do I understand the DDR2 PC2-8500, 6400 or 5300 numbers in MHz. Is
there
a conversion?

What is the difference in this situation between 8500, 6400 and 5300? I
would assume speed or something. I have looked in some stores and most
said
5300 and other numbers on the tags, or I found the MHz numbers. I have yet
to
find any 8500 or 6400.

Most people have said a 2GB piece would/may work in the slots if I tried.
But I just want to confirm it can. I would trust what Crucial.com says as
that site has been highly recommended on this forum to me often.

It's simple. To find the PC2- number for a specific DDR2 RAM speed,
just multiply the RAM's MHz speed by 8, and vice versa. The PC number
represents the bandwidth, or throughput, in megabytes per second.
The memory width is 64 bits, or 8 bytes, so 8 multiplied by the speed
gives the bandwidth. For example, 800MHz DDR2 RAM would be
PC2-6400. If you see PC3, that indicates DDR3 RAM.
 
Thank you everybody. Thank's for the conversion. I am using the computer to
make music and I am just getting into video editing and pictures. I need
plenty of RAM.

In a NIVIDIA control panel, I allowed it to allocate the RAM to get the best
my system can handle. From 256Mb it upped it to 4-point-something Mb. My
system is slower, but I never knew the video card was that good (compared to
before)!

So I finally cracked open that motherboard manual. The three Mhz speeds are
in there. I wrote them down, but know where to get them. I am noticing that
my computer came with some stuff the manual didn't include and were the
optional components (eg: No floppy disk drive, but I have the 4 card reader).
This is happening a lot with all these files I am reading.

It's DDR2, my system cannot support DDR3 apparently. It's the mobo I think,
and that is something I cannot change unless that is replaced.

The answer to replacing the motherboard and/or whole system at this time is:
NO! I am trying to upgrade and breath more life into this machine! It STILL
has some thing inside! When I look at the idea of maxing it out completely -
It is way cheaper than buying a new computer and it looks like my computer
would act like a super-computer compared to now (and even be a good model
compared to some things out there). It's not quad and i7, etc but oh well.
All those high end parts that are the most my mobo can support are dirt cheap
now.

I have to upgrade. It's the future of pc'ing! (That's my joke, play on
words, etc. It's actually true you know?).
 
One other thing: I am assuming that the higher numbers means the RAM performs
better? Or processes things better?

eg: The PC2-8500 it better than the 6400 and 5300. The 6400 is better than
the 5300.
 
Brian said:
One other thing: I am assuming that the higher numbers means the RAM performs
better? Or processes things better?

eg: The PC2-8500 it better than the 6400 and 5300. The 6400 is better than
the 5300.

Faster RAM will perform better only if the PC supports the higher
speeds, but sticking faster RAM into an old/slower PC will do no good.
 
Maybe I should start another post for this one, but I'll try it here first.

How much does the brand of RAM matter?

In the motherboard pdf/help file for my mobo, it listed a long list of the
supported brands and types or RAM. I take this "with a grain of salt", since
that manual is older and like most things in this world: As long as it is
created properly with the right components, the ability of the final product
doesn't often variate between different brands. Soe of those companies listed
may not be in business anymore or are named different too.

This question is related to other and all computer components. Which is
best? But it's all up to the individual, what else is being used, your price
range, physics, operating systems, electricity (?), etc. And some house
brands or no name brands are made by the same companies of the name brands.

What shoudl I look for? I have the mhx or the other number, the pin, the
amount, DDR2 fits, etc. I'm ready, but looking online and in store, some
brands vary wildly with price. But is it quality too?
 
IMO We are talking "Religion" here
But unless you have Processs that Are extremely critical and you absolutitly
need the FASTEST and BEST
The average RAM will work
Most follow specific requirements and the process of making RAM Chips is
Pretty Much Standardized also
(Anyone can make RAM)

As far as Somone CLAIMing their RAM is Supieriou than someone elses.
The numbers don't add up.
Yes Better but how much Will it make in your PC?
Because that 1% of Performance Increase Will Cost you XXX More.

So you got to ask yourself? What do you do? and is the extra effort worth
it?
IMO The OEM stuff will work and you won't noticed any difference.
(I know the Crutial FANBOYS will Attack that Statement)

But This really depends on What you want.
If you Want to BRAG that you have the BEST (SPEND THE MONEY)
If you want to Work and Not Pay extra for Hype?
Buy stuff at OEMPCWORLD.com or NEWEGG.com

My guess is you personally won't noticed a difference.
Tomshardware.com would be a good place to visit if you want to Know the REAL
Numbers.

However the Manufacture of the Motherboard will State at time of Build
The Recommended Brand Maybe and you may see a slight difference.
(Or they may just get kickbacks from XXX Company.)

good luck in your Quest for the Holly Grail!
:)
Russ
--
Russell Grover - SBITS.Biz [SBS-MVP]
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
Microsoft Certified Small Business Specialist
24hr SBS Remote Support - http://www.SBITS.Biz
Microsoft Online Services - http://www.microsoft-online-services.com
 
Dear
ANONYMOU_S

AKA Person who can't type?

Is your whole life dedicated to make your self look dumb?
or just part of it?

At first I thought you were just uneducated?
Now it looks like you are deliberate?

Are you pretending to be dumb or just really dumb?
(Sorry when you don't know who you are it's hard to tell.)
Best wishes on learning and learning your own name... :)
Russ

--
Russell Grover - SBITS.Biz [SBS-MVP]
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
Microsoft Certified Small Business Specialist
24hr SBS Remote Support - http://www.SBITS.Biz
Microsoft Online Services - http://www.microsoft-online-services.com
 
Thank you for the links.

I'll check the links. The reply Russ is pretty much what I thought and
typed. I just ask around sometimes to hear more experienced users opinions or
experience.

It's just like cords for your stereo or tv. I will say there can be a slight
difference. But unless it is a huge production, I doubt it will realy be
noticed.
 
My favorite is "Gold" Plated USB Cables.
Like a Gold Plated USB cable is going to make that Print job come out
cleaner and crisper?

Not going to make a bit of difference...
Either the Data makes it or it doesn't
Russ

--
Russell Grover - SBITS.Biz [SBS-MVP]
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
Microsoft Certified Small Business Specialist
24hr SBS Remote Support - http://www.SBITS.Biz
Microsoft Online Services - http://www.microsoft-online-services.com
 
Back
Top