P
Pete
Forgive my ignorance but I'm trying to decide which method to use for RIS
installations. I've been reading some documentation on RIS and am slightly
confused...
Why would anyone use RISETUP to create an image of an operating system when
they could use RIPREP which (according to the documentation) is faster and
can be used on different hardware (as long as the HALs are compatible).
Also RIPREP can install the O/S, settings and other applications whereas
RISETUP can't store desktop settings and can only install applications with
a script (and also it's a lot slower than RIPREP). With a fast ethernet
network connection RIPREP is supposed to be able to copy a 2.5Gb image to a
client machine in 3.5 minutes. RISETUP would take much longer.
Even if I didn't have to roll out a standard desktop environment and just
wanted a flat O/S then wouldn't RIPREP be better because it's faster?
Any comments appreciated.
Thanks
Pete
installations. I've been reading some documentation on RIS and am slightly
confused...
Why would anyone use RISETUP to create an image of an operating system when
they could use RIPREP which (according to the documentation) is faster and
can be used on different hardware (as long as the HALs are compatible).
Also RIPREP can install the O/S, settings and other applications whereas
RISETUP can't store desktop settings and can only install applications with
a script (and also it's a lot slower than RIPREP). With a fast ethernet
network connection RIPREP is supposed to be able to copy a 2.5Gb image to a
client machine in 3.5 minutes. RISETUP would take much longer.
Even if I didn't have to roll out a standard desktop environment and just
wanted a flat O/S then wouldn't RIPREP be better because it's faster?
Any comments appreciated.
Thanks
Pete