B
Bruno
Hi,
Is it possible for some applications to be slower on a 2.CPU w/HT than
on the same CPU w/o HT?
Background:
Basically, I see that a one threaded application seems to only use 50%
of the CPU in task manager in Windows XP. I guess a SMP-aware
application would spread its threads amongs the two logical CPUs, but
a single threaded application would stick to a single logical CPU.
So, if I've understood things correctly so far, the real questions
behind would be :
- Does HT make two logical CPU half the speed of the physical CPU, or
does HT emulate two logical CPUs of the same speed?
- Would an application stuck to 50% in the task manager be running
slower than it would be on a CPU w/o HT?
TIA,
Bruno
Is it possible for some applications to be slower on a 2.CPU w/HT than
on the same CPU w/o HT?
Background:
Basically, I see that a one threaded application seems to only use 50%
of the CPU in task manager in Windows XP. I guess a SMP-aware
application would spread its threads amongs the two logical CPUs, but
a single threaded application would stick to a single logical CPU.
So, if I've understood things correctly so far, the real questions
behind would be :
- Does HT make two logical CPU half the speed of the physical CPU, or
does HT emulate two logical CPUs of the same speed?
- Would an application stuck to 50% in the task manager be running
slower than it would be on a CPU w/o HT?
TIA,
Bruno