I agree with you and David that "for /L" is not the best tool for the job
compared with the original for command. But it *is* possible to generate the
sequence "1 7 16" using a "for /L" loop:
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.