B
barabba72
Hello all,
TechNet says this:
Active Directory replication does not rely on time to determine what
changes need to be propagated. It relies on the use of Update Sequence
Numbers (USNs) that are assigned by a counter that is local to each
domain controller. Because these USNs are local, it is easy to ensure
that they are reliable and never "run backwards". The trade-off is that
it is meaningless to compare a USN assigned on one domain controller
to a USN assigned on a different domain controller. The replication
system is designed with this restriction in mind.
What I don't get is the trade-off part of this statement. I really
don't get it. Could somebody rephrase this ?
Thank you.
Bar
TechNet says this:
Active Directory replication does not rely on time to determine what
changes need to be propagated. It relies on the use of Update Sequence
Numbers (USNs) that are assigned by a counter that is local to each
domain controller. Because these USNs are local, it is easy to ensure
that they are reliable and never "run backwards". The trade-off is that
it is meaningless to compare a USN assigned on one domain controller
to a USN assigned on a different domain controller. The replication
system is designed with this restriction in mind.
What I don't get is the trade-off part of this statement. I really
don't get it. Could somebody rephrase this ?
Thank you.
Bar