B
Brendan R. Wehrung
I recently bought a computer and am eligible to buy one of two Canon
all-in-ones, the Canon Pixma MP-160 or MP-160. I'm looking to replace a
Lexmark that does not weem to ahve a driver written for it for Vista,
which will eventually replace XP on my new computer.
While the MP-160 gained a Best Buy for bargain all-in-one from Consumer
Reports, an online review was critical of its scanner qualities. The
clerk at the store says the MP-600 is a vastly superior printer, but again
online remarks (user reviews in this case) hint that the scanner part is
deficient, that copies are almost unreadable.
I thought scanners were one of Canon's strong points.
After rebate, the MP-160 costs $45 including mandatory ink purchase, while
the MP-600 comes in at $150. The latter claims much better resolution, but
does that work out in practice?
Brendan
all-in-ones, the Canon Pixma MP-160 or MP-160. I'm looking to replace a
Lexmark that does not weem to ahve a driver written for it for Vista,
which will eventually replace XP on my new computer.
While the MP-160 gained a Best Buy for bargain all-in-one from Consumer
Reports, an online review was critical of its scanner qualities. The
clerk at the store says the MP-600 is a vastly superior printer, but again
online remarks (user reviews in this case) hint that the scanner part is
deficient, that copies are almost unreadable.
I thought scanners were one of Canon's strong points.
After rebate, the MP-160 costs $45 including mandatory ink purchase, while
the MP-600 comes in at $150. The latter claims much better resolution, but
does that work out in practice?
Brendan