R
Rob
Hi,
Wonder if someone could give some advice on something that's confusing me.
Back in the days of slow processors (600mhz AMD Athlon's etc.) and pre XP
O/S, everyone, including I, was concerned with too many programs loading at
start-up and running in the background consuming CPU time and memory, and
generally slowing things down to a crawl.
Well with the likes of the new XP O/S and today's lighting fast PC's with
huge amounts of memory do we still have to worry about this? I would like to
run quite a few apps in the background like Norton's Liveupdate, Windows
Update plus several others, but am stuck in 1998 worrying if my new P4
800FSB, 1GB DDR PC will start acting like my old 600MHz AMD 192mb PC100.
What do you all do on yours, do you all run as many background apps as
possible or do we still have to keep things to the bare minimum? Any advice
appreciated.
Rob
Wonder if someone could give some advice on something that's confusing me.
Back in the days of slow processors (600mhz AMD Athlon's etc.) and pre XP
O/S, everyone, including I, was concerned with too many programs loading at
start-up and running in the background consuming CPU time and memory, and
generally slowing things down to a crawl.
Well with the likes of the new XP O/S and today's lighting fast PC's with
huge amounts of memory do we still have to worry about this? I would like to
run quite a few apps in the background like Norton's Liveupdate, Windows
Update plus several others, but am stuck in 1998 worrying if my new P4
800FSB, 1GB DDR PC will start acting like my old 600MHz AMD 192mb PC100.
What do you all do on yours, do you all run as many background apps as
possible or do we still have to keep things to the bare minimum? Any advice
appreciated.
Rob