If you did that layout then I think you could fix it with a little help.
Starting out the use of tables is the best.
Here is a link for some training take note that there are 4 lessons just on
tables.
http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/training/CR061832701033.aspx
bob
| Thanks Bob. I guess I need to have someone possibly look into doing this
| professionally for me. It is easy to use because I can change it myself
when
| need be... Can an experienced web developer make this site a useable site
| for all browsers or am I looking at a huge cost?
|
| Thanks for the information to all. This forum is great.
|
| "Bob" wrote:
|
| > When viewed in IE it is OK... Kind of.
| > Looking at it in Fox Fire it is all out of alignment.
| >
| > This is because IE & Fox Fire calculate positions a little differently.
| > Since you have a lot of absolute positioned "Layers" they seam to not
line
| > up in one or the other.
| >
| > ---Reposting from another post "Layers are Bad"
| >
| > Layers are bad because they are absolutely positioned. As such, they
have
| > several "undesirable" characteristics (particularly for those who do not
| > understand HTML and CSS/positioning):
| >
| > 1. A layer floats over (in the z-direction, i.e., vertically out of the
| > page) other page content. Thus it can mask mouse events on that other
page
| > content - this is what is responsible for Electric Lady K's problem with
the
| > non-functional link underneath one.
| > 2. Because a layer floats over other page content, it cannot interact
with
| > that other page content - thus when the text content in a layer is
resized
| > in the browser, causing the layer to expand vertically, the text will
start
| > to overlap the other page content, leading to an unusable mess in the
| > browser.
| > 3. Because a layer is absolutely positioned, it stays fixed on the
screen
| > while other content which may be within a percent sized container is
free to
| > move around. Unless you are familiar enough with CSS to know how to
| > accommodate this flexibility, you will probably post a question here
called
| > "Why are my layers moving?". Then everyone can post replies telling you
| > that layers don't move....
| > 4. Because a layer is absolutely positioned, if it is contained within
a
| > flexible container, if the container flexes, the layer will flex with
it,
| > perhaps causing images within that layer to overlap other underlying
page
| > content. There was another post on the forum just this morning with
exactly
| > that problem.
| >
| > Layers are very seductive because they are easy to place on the page.
This
| > ease of placement extracts a VERY heavy price in terms of page usability
and
| > functionality. It's best to not use them at all until you understand
enough
| > HTML and CSS to manage the page without layers. Most experienced
developers
| > use absolute positioned elements quite sparingly if at all....
| >
| > Murray MVP
| >
| > bob
message
| > | > | Hello. I have created a webpage
www.samroyer.com for my business
(learned
| > | FrontPage in a weekend). Obviously though if you view it in anything
| > other
| > | than IE and even sometime even using IE it is messed up. Can someone
help
| > or
| > | am I going to have to drop the ammeter act and pay someone to do it?
| > Thank
| > | you
| >
| >
| >
| >