S
Sebastian
Greetings,
I have recently upgraded to Microsoft Office 2003 from
Office 2000. On opening Access, I saw the warnings about
macros and installed the latest Jet service Pack (v8).
I am trying to use a database developed for Access 2000.
Since it is still being developed, I would like to leave
it in Access 2000 format.
The problem is that the recordset on a subform shows the
correct number of records, but all have #Name? in the
fields. The subform's recordsource is a dynamically
created SELECT statement drawing from a SQL pass-through
query. The query works fine and I can see all records if
I open it from the Queries pane.
Meanwhile, the database works fine on a back-up
workstation using Office 2000.
Any thoughts or suggestions gratefully received.
I have recently upgraded to Microsoft Office 2003 from
Office 2000. On opening Access, I saw the warnings about
macros and installed the latest Jet service Pack (v8).
I am trying to use a database developed for Access 2000.
Since it is still being developed, I would like to leave
it in Access 2000 format.
The problem is that the recordset on a subform shows the
correct number of records, but all have #Name? in the
fields. The subform's recordsource is a dynamically
created SELECT statement drawing from a SQL pass-through
query. The query works fine and I can see all records if
I open it from the Queries pane.
Meanwhile, the database works fine on a back-up
workstation using Office 2000.
Any thoughts or suggestions gratefully received.