Privoxy

  • Thread starter Thread starter null
  • Start date Start date
Blinky the Shark Wrote in alt.comp.freeware, on 11 Jul 2003 21:40:07 GMT:
SINNER wrote:
Hooey. Whadda Linux guys know? ;)

Nothing............until they RTFM :P~

--
David
Anita Miller: This song explains why I'm leaving home to become a
stewardess.

-- "Almost Famous"
 
(e-mail address removed) on Fri, 11 Jul 2003 15:39:32 GMT:
An excellent alternative to Proxomitron:

I wish the Proxomitron guy would continue developing his program and
that the idiot who encouraged him to stop doing so would be send to
northern Siberia.

Frank
 
Frank Wrote in alt.comp.freeware, on Sat, 12 Jul 2003 01:09:52 +0200:
(e-mail address removed) on Fri, 11 Jul 2003 15:39:32 GMT:
I wish the Proxomitron guy would continue developing his program and
that the idiot who encouraged him to stop doing so would be send to
northern Siberia.

Is that true? The stop development part?
 
SINNER said:
Frank Wrote in alt.comp.freeware, on Sat, 12 Jul 2003 01:09:52 +0200:
Is that true? The stop development part?

I don't know how it stands now, but, IIRC, a month or two ago, some guy
(who has a site with Proxo forums on it) badgered Scott about a bug or
two that Scott gave up and said he was finished. I think he (Scott)
effectively pulled the plug on his (own) site, as well.
 
Blinky the Shark Wrote in alt.comp.freeware, on 12 Jul 2003 06:00:18 GMT:
SINNER wrote:
All I know's what I read in this group, SINNER. Been to the home page,
lately? http://proxomitron.cjb.net

I wasnt be accusatory. I was merely commenting on the issue. I had not
read the website in a while but do remember looking for it some time ago
and having a problem, I attributed it to problems on my side. My comment
includes myself as a theorist as it just makes no sence that someone
would stop developing such an excellent piece of software because of one
a-hole. If that ever happened to MAME, I'd jump off the nearest bridge ;)

Oh, look, back on topic :) Try MAME today!
 
SINNER said:
Blinky the Shark Wrote in alt.comp.freeware, on 12 Jul 2003 06:00:18 GMT:
I wasnt be accusatory. I was merely commenting on the issue. I had not

And I was only being informational. :)
read the website in a while but do remember looking for it some time ago
and having a problem, I attributed it to problems on my side. My comment
includes myself as a theorist as it just makes no sence that someone
would stop developing such an excellent piece of software because of one
a-hole. If that ever happened to MAME, I'd jump off the nearest bridge ;)

I only heard about that one person being associated with Scott pulling
the plug. http://asp.flaaten.dk/ But note disclaimer at bottom of page
(unless site is fixed, by now). It was up yesterday; today the Proxo
forum are down, but everything else is up.
 
My comment
includes myself as a theorist as it just makes no sence that someone
would stop developing such an excellent piece of software because of one
a-hole. If that ever happened to MAME, I'd jump off the nearest bridge ;)

I doubt it was the first person, rather it was just one more annoying
person on top of everything else. Probably the guy also got tired of
working on the program.
 
Probably, yes. Sorry.

Here it is:

From: "Arne" <arneflaa@y...>
Date: Mon Jun 2, 2003 5:09 pm
Subject: The message from Scott

It has been asked if I could post the message from Scott, and Scott
has said it was OK if I posted it here, so here goes:

Quote:

This is the only post I will make regarding Proxomiton.

Yes, I pulled the site down.

No, It's not because of Arne so no one should blame him. I'm not happy
with all those on the Yahoo list doing so.

I make lots of changes to the program with being human I sometimes
forget to document. I added this one because of a few emails
requesting it since it was a minor alteration (1 line of code). I
fogot about it until it was mentioned on the list.

Yes, I was hurt that Arne attacked me personally for this rather than
just making a case for changing it back - which I probably would have
been willing to do if enough people wanted it. I think my post at
Yahoo confirm this: As I said on the list, people will of course only
request something the program doesn't already do. So I know having a
number of requests for an item doesn't necessairly mean that's what
most people want.

I don't use "anon" proxies much myself anymore so I didn't think much
about it from that angle. To me having fail-over seem like a good idea
since it makes the connection itself more reliable. The basic argument
people requesting the feature made to me was "A proxy is to help your
connection - one that you can't connect to isn't helping". To be
bypassed the proxy actually has to fail to connect - usually after
several retries. The problem is many anon proxies are overloaded or
misconfigured so connection failures are not as uncommon as they are
with a normal proxy.

As Arne said, this isn't the first time I've considered giving it all
up. This is just the first time I've actually done it. I apologize,
I'm not perfect - all I was trying to do was the best I can. However,
if a change I considered so minor can get me labeled as a "betrayer of
trust" from someone I've long regarded with respect, then perhaps I
shouldn't be doing this at all.

In the end it's a matter of balance. There are many, many reasons for
me to give it up - not just this. In this day and age I even worry
someone might sue me because of it. I have to ask myself why devote so
much of my life to something when it can illicit this kind of reaction
from people. I've never asked that *anyone* use the program, and I'm
surely not offended if people wish to use something else.

Lastly, although the official versions may be re-distributed the
beta's may not (this was made clear in the readme that came with
them). I ask that their license please be respected. They do contain
bugs which were fixed in the final version (non withstanding any bugs
that may have) and it's possible these bugs could be exploited.
 
Back
Top