- Joined
- Apr 11, 2007
- Messages
- 956
- Reaction score
- 59
Has anyone caught the artical on printer ink in the Daily Mail of the 5/3/2013?
The artical is quite long but interesting.
One quote from the makers was that "...because printers are now more efficiant that they use less ink" In fact rhe amount of ink in the cartriges over the last decade has fallen from 10ml to 4/5ml. It mentioned that a cartridge costing £13 and containing a measly 4ml of ink. It works out that one litre of the stuff would come to £3,000!!
I know that this theme has been aired over and over again,but do the makers of the ink really think people are stupid when they come out with the above statement that printers are getting more efficiant,there fore less ink.But of course costing the same or,more likely,much more.Do you not think that these large printer manufacturers should listen to it`s customers?
historian
The artical is quite long but interesting.
One quote from the makers was that "...because printers are now more efficiant that they use less ink" In fact rhe amount of ink in the cartriges over the last decade has fallen from 10ml to 4/5ml. It mentioned that a cartridge costing £13 and containing a measly 4ml of ink. It works out that one litre of the stuff would come to £3,000!!
I know that this theme has been aired over and over again,but do the makers of the ink really think people are stupid when they come out with the above statement that printers are getting more efficiant,there fore less ink.But of course costing the same or,more likely,much more.Do you not think that these large printer manufacturers should listen to it`s customers?
historian