D
Dick Straw
This may be a bit exotic -- botanical nomenclature. Where a species is
identified as a hybrid its name has an X prefix, but it is properly
displayed in the alpha order of the name itself, ignoring the X. I have a
report based on a query that provides the information, including a long
string that concatenates the parts of the species name for the report. The
query sorts and displays the name in the correct order, ignoring the X, but
the report based on the query places the X-prefixed species at the bottom of
the genus list. Frustrating.
identified as a hybrid its name has an X prefix, but it is properly
displayed in the alpha order of the name itself, ignoring the X. I have a
report based on a query that provides the information, including a long
string that concatenates the parts of the species name for the report. The
query sorts and displays the name in the correct order, ignoring the X, but
the report based on the query places the X-prefixed species at the bottom of
the genus list. Frustrating.