Most often I hear that the highpoint cards are easier to set up. If
you'll settle for ATA100 instead of ATA133 then this might be a good buy:
http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProductDesc.asp?description=16-115-001&depa=0
Google could probably find some benchmarks... offhand I vaguely recall
that the SIIG cards were slower at "something" and the Highpoints had
lower CPU utilization... comparing only these sub-$100 soft-RAID cards.
As to "justified", I doubt it can be justified to charge so much more than
the SIIG for the Promise or Highpoint, but then again the SIIG has a crude
text-based configuration too (yet still usable), possible a few other
drawbacks but I don't remember any at the moment. I'd probably get the
Highpoint if I were buying today but I already have a couple motherboards
running drives off the Promise ATA133 (lite) that're modified to be
Promise (regular) RAID and they work fine too. However at least the
Promise RAID cards don't support ATAPI devices. I don't recall whether
the others do or not but I thought the SIIG did. I also have a system
with one of the SIIG cards but I so rarely use it I don't even have a good
feel for how fast it is, and different drives are in use on it so I can't
directly compare it's performance.
Other features for more $, around $100, would be 4 channels, RAID 5, 10.
Also I don't recall if/when the ATA100 cards started supporting 48bit LBA,
it could be that you'd need to update the bios on an old card but that's
not difficult. For only a couple of RAIDed drives and a single spare
there isn't a good reason to spend a lot more for ATA133... each channel
supports 100MB/s so given the details you've provided, only a 2-drive
array, it's not going to be a significant performance difference using an
ATA100 card.