Pricelessware Cumulative List

  • Thread starter Thread starter Susan Bugher
  • Start date Start date
http://www.pricelessware.org/2003/CumulativeList.htm

I thought this might be useful to some . . .

It's an alphabetical list of PW programs from 2001-2003 (includes 2003
PW nominations). :)

Suggestions? Comments?

Susan
Click to expand...

IMO the above page should be referenced to,

http://www.pricelessware.org/2003/PL2003AlphabeticalList.htm

and the 2002 version. Wherever that is.

As well as being referenced from both those pages.

Lastly, IMO the above page should include the date eg. "Pricelessware"
(2002-2003). Probably the same should apply to the 2001-2002 version.


Regards, John.

--
****************************************************
,-._|\ (A.C.F FAQ) http://clients.net2000.com.au/~johnf/faq.html
/ Oz \ John Fitzsimons - Melbourne, Australia.
\_,--.x/ http://www.aspects.org.au/index.htm
v http://clients.net2000.com.au/~johnf/
 
Hi Malù,

I agree but that's a bit more work. :)

This is the *quick and dirty* version. I don't guarantee 100 percent
accuracy (have already spotted one error). Revisions to follow . . .
Click to expand...

If the EXPELLED are also noted there, their expulsion from the list
and reason for it should also be noted - it should be recorded
somewhere, even in a separate "hall of shame" perhaps?
 
If the EXPELLED are also noted there, their expulsion from the list
and reason for it should also be noted - it should be recorded
somewhere, even in a separate "hall of shame" perhaps?
Click to expand...

Why??????

most common reason is change to $ware . . .

Susan
 
Matt said:
If the EXPELLED are also noted there, their expulsion from the list
and reason for it should also be noted - it should be recorded
somewhere, even in a separate "hall of shame" perhaps?
Click to expand...

While it may be of anecdotal interest to see which programs have been chosen
year after year and which have been dropped, the primary purpose of the list
is to provide people who frequent this newsgroup with a quick reference list
of what the members of this group currently think to be the best programs in
each category.

Furthermore, programs can be dropped simply for not being re-nominated
during the next cycle. Nothing shameful about it.
 
Genna said:
Matt wrote:
Click to expand...
While it may be of anecdotal interest to see which programs have been
chosen year after year and which have been dropped, the primary
purpose of the list is to provide people who frequent this newsgroup
with a quick reference list of what the members of this group
currently think to be the best programs in each category.
Click to expand...
Furthermore, programs can be dropped simply for not being re-nominated
during the next cycle. Nothing shameful about it.
Click to expand...

Agree, Genna. I don't think a list of favorites need contain an arhive
of old business.
 
Agree, Genna. I don't think a list of favorites need contain an arhive
of old business.
Click to expand...

Nonsense! Archiving old business makes it possible to rehash old arguments
long after they might have died a natural death and/or become irrelevant.
 
Back
Top