Rand said:
I have an AGP + standard PCI system. I don't want to go to the expense of a
completely new system so I've considered purchasing Sapphire ATI Radeon
X1950 Pro AGP graphics card. However the power supply in my current system
is only 320watts. I understand that I need at least a 450watt PSU to
effectively use this card. What confuses me is that PSUs' now state ATX2.0
or ATX2.2 and PCIe etc. I know my setup is just ATX, can anyone give me a
clue as to what I need to purchase and any recomended make?
Thanks,
Alan
SYSTEM
Intel Pentium 3.2Ghz
Sapphire ATI Radeon X850XT
1Gb Corsair DDR400 ram
The X850XT is 68.6 watts.
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/gpu-consumption2006_6.html
This X1950Pro is 65.7 watts. This could be the PCI Express version, in which
case the AGP version has the Railto bridge on it. Maybe allocate an extra
few watts for that. AFAIK, the AGP and the PCI Express are clocked the same.
But the AGP version gets a bit less performance, due to AGP. Which means
the power will actually be less than the 65.7W (do less work, draw less
power).
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/x1950pro-gf7900gs_6.html
Which means, in terms of the "power class" of the two cards, they are
about the same. The reason the power will drop a bit on new cards,
is due to the use of finer geometry silicon. That is compensated by
stuffing more circuitry on the chip.
The rails that the power is drawn from, can vary from design to design.
The X850XT uses a Molex 1x4, meaning the card has access to +5V and
+12V, and could use some of both. The HIS X1950Pro AGP has a PCI Express
2x3, meaning 12V is used. A Diamond card uses two Molex 1x4, which is
a bit strange, same as Sapphire. In fact, it doesn't look like the
manufacturers are all using the same reference design.
But at the current time, I don't see a reason to panic.
To work out some numbers, it would help to have a full hardware inventory,
including the SLxxx number on the processor box if you've got it. Even
knowing whether the processor is Northwood or Prescott would help. Also,
the ratings on the side of the supply would help. You'll see something
like this on the label.
+3.3V@32A, +5V@32A, +12V@26A, -5V@1A, -12V@1A,
[email protected]
3.3V & 5V to 185W
total power 350W
If you just want to go out and buy another supply, that isn't a problem.
The ATX 2.0+ supplies are dual rail, and may offer a 20+4 connector. The
20+4 splits into two pieces, if you just want a 20 pin connector. The
processor is tied to 12V2 rail. The rest of the system runs off 12V1.
(The older supplies just had "12V" and a single supply rail.)
As an example of processor power, a Prescott 3.2E draws 89W. And
my usual assumption is 90% Vcore converter efficiency.
http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SL7E5
89W/12V * (1/0.90) = 8.24A for 12V2.
The 12V1 would be 2.5A for a CD, a HDD, some fans, plus allow
about 70W from 12V1 for the video card with the 2x3 PCI Express
power connector. 70W/12V = approx 6A. So 8.5A on 12V1 would be
the bare minimum, to run the new card.
This is an example of a 400W ATX 2.0+ supply.
+3.3V@30A, +5V@30A, +12V1@18A, +12V2@18A,
[email protected], +5VSB@2A
12V1 and 12V2 to 345W.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16817104952
By calculation, (8.24A + 8.5A) * 12V = 201W and fits within the
345W limit on both 12V rails. The 3.3V and 5V have a max power
of 150W total, and 50W is a ballpark estimate for the average
setup. Which means, when gaming, I'm estimating ~250W of
power usage at the output of the supply.
Even this supply has the specs to meet the application, and has
a total rating of 380W. But the trick is to read the reviews,
to help separate the good ones from the bad ones. A supply has
to have a clean review record, and meet the specs, to be worth
taking a shot at. Using the reviews is about the only way, to
find the ones with honest labeling.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/CustratingReview.asp?item=N82E16817182047
Paul