D
Doug Kanter
I've got a mission-critical machine that needs a power supply. Are there any
brands that are real standouts? If yes, which and why?
brands that are real standouts? If yes, which and why?
Doug said:I've got a mission-critical machine that needs a power supply. Are there any
brands that are real standouts? If yes, which and why?
I've got a mission-critical machine that needs a power supply. Are there any
brands that are real standouts? If yes, which and why?
altho i think that ocz makes very gfood PSUs, the "modder"
supply I recently bought is a disaster! The power part is fine.
But the wires are bundled together tightly and covered in some kind
of UV sensitive wrap. Looks good in the package. But you
try bending 4 wires in a small area. then try 20!
...thehick
Doug said:I've got a mission-critical machine that needs a power supply.
Porn?
Are there any brands that are real standouts? If yes, which and why?
For example, JonnyGuru destroyed a couple of 550W Powmax
Assassins at loads of just 200-300W (he gave up on a third sample
because it was acting funny at around that power) but was able to
squeeze 500W from a Fortron-Source rated for just 300W.
larry said:Be skeptical of power ratings because companies apply widely different
standards to them. For example, PCP&C rates its PSUs at 40 Celcius
while almost everybody else uses 25C, and that can make a 15-30%
difference (a 510W PCP&C can put out 600W @ 25C).
I've got a mission-critical machine that needs a power supply. Are there
any
brands that are real standouts? If yes, which and why?
Unfortunately, JonnyGuru's testing methodology is flawed.
He tests for sustained load for only a short time, short
enough that many PSU we generally accept as crap would pass
such a test but do end up failing months later. There are
other nagging problems with some of his reports about ripple
too (don't know if they're on his site, I was arguing with
him about it once). I suppose the point is that data is
better than no data but a bit quick to conclusion sometimes.
UCLAN said:PCP&C rates its supplies at 50 degrees Celsius, not 40.
DaveW said:Antec are the most conservatively rated, longest lasting, best selling
models out there. I have been using them for many years successfully in
many systems.
larry said:You're right. They must have improved their products and changed their
rating system since the time they had put out the following:
http://static.flickr.com/42/85930952_1e85a06b89.jpg
Here's the current version:
www.pcpowercooling.com/pdf/Turbo-Cool_510_vs.pdf
In both pictures, the other, unnamed, PSU is a 550W Enermax (rated @
25C).
larry said:But, as UCLAN mentioned, PC Power & Cooling rates its PSUs at 50
Celcius, compared to 25C for Antec:
The Antec NeoHE 550 *is* rated at 50 degrees C., while their
True Power 550 is only rated at 530w at 50 degrees C. Go figure.
It varies by model.
UCLAN said:larry moe 'n curly wrote:
PCP&C rates its supplies at 50 degrees Celsius, not 40.
That link gives me a "This photo is currently unavailable" announcement.
I'm really interested in what the "old" link is for. PCP&C has been
rating their products at 50 degrees C. for as long as I remember.
larry said:Sorry. I accidentally deleted the picture. The link has been fixed.