Thank you John for your help,
I'm creating my database for my business, a funeral home.
The main form (the one with the comboboxes) is based on the 'deathinfo'
table.
This table has a primary key called [Casenum].
This [Casenum] serves as a "foriegn key?" in the "todo" table.
The structure of the "todo" table is as follows:
1.id - key
2.Casenum
3. todo item
4. notes
5. completed (y/n)
So for example: So depending on what the family wants for a funeral
service, the record, or deathcall might have the following items
appear in the "todo" table.
cboCemetery - call john doe gravedigger at 339-3434,
cboCemetery - contact cemetery sexton at 339-2121
cboMonument - contact monument company for last date
cboMinister - call Rev. Corning at 339-2121
cboOrganist - call betty at 339-2121
If the Cemetary, Monument, and Organist information is stored in the
deathinfo table, and can be uniquely identified by the Casenum, then I
see no point in storing the same information redundantly in the ToDo
table. You can store the notes; and you can create a query joining the
two tables to pull the information together. It appears that I'm
missing the point! If the Cemetary has the name and phone number of
the gravedigger, that information can be pulled from a Query; the date
information can come from the DeathInfo table; I'm not sure I see why
the ToDo table is even necessary, since all of the information it
contains is already available.
Ok... thinking about it - the one thing that ISN'T available is the
Completed yes/no field. Given that... you could create an Append query
joining the DeathInfo table to the tables of ministers, organists,
etc. and populate the ToDo list. I'd suggest not packing names and
phone numbers into a Notes field though; since most of the entries
have the same structure - "call <person X> in <role Y> at <phone>",
I'd say that you should have fields for the person, the role, and
their phone.
John W. Vinson[MVP]