Searcher7 said:
I assume you are referring to the display adapter drivers, correct?
(Perhaps I'll trying e-mailing VIA again).
Thanks.
Darren Harris
Staten Island, New York.
Yes, the display adapter drivers.
The cores have names, like UniChrome Pro. (Check the name
of yours again - I forgot)
And the same core gets used again and again. If they stop
offering a driver directly for your chipset (on the mini-ITX
motherboard), there is a possibility a driver for another chipset,
one with the same graphics core, could be used. And if that chip
is more recent, it may benefit from any bug fixes they
discover along the way.
If the board has a slot for a plug-in card, that would be
another way to "fix" the problem. By fitting a graphics
card with better drivers. But at least a few of those
little boards, have inferior single slots. Like say,
a PCI slot, running at 133MB/sec. On some mini-ITX (without
VIA chipset), they've offered as good as a PCI Express x16 slot,
in which you can put a regular video card. You could get
a relatively low power one, which would give you DXVA and a
smattering of 3D gaming performance (no it won't run Crysis
well, but of course your processor couldn't push the pixels
for that anyway). But what are the odds, that a board with
relatively broken graphics, offers a stellar expansion slot ?
There are PCI graphics cards, they do work, but the driver
writers put checks in the drivers, for the card slot type.
Things like motion compensation, or 3:2 pulldown, are disabled
when the slot bandwidth is inferior. So rather than leaving
all the eye candy turned on and letting the user play with it,
they just decide for you, and turn some of it off. And that's
why I can't give an unreserved recommendation to an
"ordinary" PCI graphics card. If you had any kind of PCI
Express slot, that's better. I think the driver will disable
one feature, if it detects x1 PCI Express lane wiring. But
doesn't cut quite as many features, as may be cut for a PCI
slot type.
They really meant these little boards to be a challenge,
and this one is excelling at it.
Another possibility, is to find a web forum that
specializes in mini-ITX, and see if anyone there
managed to find a good driver.
*******
Notice a Linux user didn't have much luck.
He ended up using Windows.
http://forums.gbpvr.com/showthread.php?32980-Via-Epia-M10000-(C3-1ghz-Nehemiah)-Success-story!
*******
There is a PCI video card here, as an example of a
more modern card. This would replace your on-chip
graphics, and there would be a video decoder in
the video card.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814500262
ZOTAC ZT-60604-10L GeForce GT 610
"serves its purpose
Pros: Used to replace a bad HDMI port on a mini-itx motherboard
with a single PCI slot. Functions as it should in Ubuntu
12.04 using the proprietary driver, giving me native 720p
output for my monitor and HDMI audio (the former of which
I was unable to achieve using my board's antiquated
onboard VGA)."
From the Nvidia site for the GT 610.
Thermal and Power Specs:
102 C Maximum GPU Temperature (in C)
29 W Maximum Graphics Card Power (W)
Apparently it's a rebadged GT 520.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5845/...ased-geforce-gt-610-gt-620-gt-630-into-retail
The video decoder in the GT 520 is "fifth-generation Purevideo".
A lot more of the video decoding process, would be
done by the hardware.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purevideo
ATI has a parallel feature set, and there may be
modern cards from them on Newegg. This HD 5450
is an HTPC type of video card, and relatively
low power.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814161353
The HD 5450 is 9.2 watts while gaming, and 3.2 watts idle.
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/graphics/display/gpu-power-consumption-2010_3.html#sect0
The HD5450 is UVD 2.2 level video decoding. So it's not
the latest ATI has got. Unfortunately, I don't see any
UVD 3 capable cards, in a PCI format.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UVD
Paul