um you are seriously going in the WRONG direction with this
- Oh yes indeed! But you started this, and I'm taking it wherever it
goes. >:-(
you have not found a fanatic (like yourself) about the subject nor do
I care about your opinions on how fast something is. AMD is cheaper thats all. I have had them in desktop machines I owned and a
Laptop or two. whoopee who gives a damn.....
??? - You think my beef with you is some AMD vs Intel issue??!
- How do you socialize in your family??
(But OK, rereading the thread, I can suddenly see why you could think
that. So I might owe you an explanation. Well, the "bugging",
"frustration", "hunch", "problem" I've been mentioning, refers to you
trying to shut me up.)
quit talking bullshit you want to SUGGEST using them great, other than that keep the
'convo on terra firma' and don't interject your OPINION as fact.
I'm going to be very elaborate. But let's cut right to the core of
this right from the start, so there won't be any misunderstandings:
- I'll post whatever I damn please! - Even my OPINION!
You may argue/debate with me, but you _MAY_NOT_MODERATE_ me! Nor do I
take well to being called fanatic or any other abuse.
"you know these unfounded little 'facts' like twice as fast in office apps is getting old..."
"i care less about your relatives...."
"The part about why AMD needs so many salesman"
What f*** kind of comments is that? >:-(
I'll tell you what f*** kind of comments it is. It's the kind of
insidious remarks from someone who doesn't care to see my posts or
opinions on this group, and who talking down from some conceited air
of superiourity, tries to do something about it.
- And if there's anything that is "talking bullshit" and doesn't
belong here, it's exactly that!
And now me "fanatic"? Excuse me, mr. selfstyled moderator, I'm not
going to let you brand me that.
Really? "fanatic"? I'm confessed biased. It's a question of honesty,
people should know where I stand. So how come you figure I merit the
label 'fanatic'. My posts? Let's see now:
I've always pointed out P4 is better on media.
I never even mentioned AMD in my recent exchange with 'unbekannt'
since I knew he would be better served by an Intel P4.
Also recently, I even interjected that a P4 would do well, when I
learned that 'Night-Seer' planned XP3000+ was going to be used for
Adobe Photoshop.
Is:
Business Winstone 2002:
Athlon XP2000+ 32.8
Pentium 4 1.7GHz 22.6
my opinion?
It was quite ok of you asking for that evidence. You're in full right
sofar. But your choice of words and general tone, made me suspect you
didn't really care and something else was the agenda. And I sure seem
to be right about that.
"nor do I care about your opinions on how fast something is"
"whoopee who gives a damn....."
Exactly! That's not your point at all. Your point is that since you
don't care about my opinions, you figure I shouldn't post them..
Well, you're in for a disappointment.
ancra