Please lend me an ear and hepl me with this annoying matter.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

,.Good Morning,
I am having trouble with sending emails. I had my old account set up to
where when you sent emails to whom ever in the address box only their name
will appear not the email address . I LIKE TO KEEP MY EMAIL ADDYS PRIVATE. i
only like the p
erson's name or names showing in the inbox which I want the email to go too.
Thanks for your time.
ROC
 
In Windows Mail, there's no way to turn off the name & email address when
you compose a message.
However, Windows Live Mail only shows the name.

If you are sending to multiple recipients and wish not to share their
addresses, use the BCC: field
All they see is Undisclosed-Recipient:
 
You are confusing what *you* see when composing the message with
what the recipient sees when he receives it. The two views are not the same.
Windows Mail does not reveal anything more to the recipient than what Outlook
Express revealed.
 
If Live Mail is so great why didnt it ship with IE 7 or come installed with
Vista Ultimate?
Why has yahoo exceeded you in compatability with your own accounts?
Let alone help file support and has not failed once to work over the last 2
months for the same price?
I think you have really made a bonehead deployment.
MS has market share for catering to the home user and totally made it a
convoluted if not impossible mess for any parochial user to gain access
without ludicrous demands for more money than the 3rd party vendors?
I'm a low end programmer and I even recognize good AJAX controls and Live
isn't using them right at all.
 
You keep saying "Live Mail." There is no such product as Live Mail.
There is Windows Live Hotmail, a webmail client.
And Windows Live Mail beta, a standard mail client which also
supports MSN/Hotmail accounts.
Windows Live Mail is still in beta testing, so it was not ready to
ship with IE7.
I don't know what your "ludicrous demands for more money" refers to,
since the two Microsoft solutions mentioned above are both free.
 
Probably because I didn't want to waste the time giving it a proper name.
Diversion doesn't change the fact the system is by far below what was in
place. It's overcomplicated. It didn't notify of any update either which led
me to look elsewhere. The help files are lousy and over complicated as well
to support the account setup. Outlook Express & Hotmail was 100 times a
better product with actual simple easy to use features that didn't demand
some 10 step program alteration for every feature. I don't want to get Live
Mail Desktop Beta because the last beta quit working with your own accounts.

Gary VanderMolen said:
You keep saying "Live Mail." There is no such product as Live Mail.
There is Windows Live Hotmail, a webmail client.
And Windows Live Mail beta, a standard mail client which also
supports MSN/Hotmail accounts.
Windows Live Mail is still in beta testing, so it was not ready to
ship with IE7.
I don't know what your "ludicrous demands for more money" refers to,
since the two Microsoft solutions mentioned above are both free.

--
Gary VanderMolen [MS MVP-WLM]


Chris Moor said:
If Live Mail is so great why didnt it ship with IE 7 or come installed with
Vista Ultimate?
Why has yahoo exceeded you in compatability with your own accounts?
Let alone help file support and has not failed once to work over the last 2
months for the same price?
I think you have really made a bonehead deployment.
MS has market share for catering to the home user and totally made it a
convoluted if not impossible mess for any parochial user to gain access
without ludicrous demands for more money than the 3rd party vendors?
I'm a low end programmer and I even recognize good AJAX controls and Live
isn't using them right at all.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
You are making your judgment based on a very early beta version
of what was called Windows Live Mail Desktop prior to May 30th.
The current beta version (which has dropped the 'Desktop' part of
the old name) is a much better email program, and I anticipate that
future builds will be even better.
--
Gary VanderMolen [MS MVP-WLM]


Chris Moor said:
Probably because I didn't want to waste the time giving it a proper name.
Diversion doesn't change the fact the system is by far below what was in
place. It's overcomplicated. It didn't notify of any update either which led
me to look elsewhere. The help files are lousy and over complicated as well
to support the account setup. Outlook Express & Hotmail was 100 times a
better product with actual simple easy to use features that didn't demand
some 10 step program alteration for every feature. I don't want to get Live
Mail Desktop Beta because the last beta quit working with your own accounts.

Gary VanderMolen said:
You keep saying "Live Mail." There is no such product as Live Mail.
There is Windows Live Hotmail, a webmail client.
And Windows Live Mail beta, a standard mail client which also
supports MSN/Hotmail accounts.
Windows Live Mail is still in beta testing, so it was not ready to
ship with IE7.
I don't know what your "ludicrous demands for more money" refers to,
since the two Microsoft solutions mentioned above are both free.

--
Gary VanderMolen [MS MVP-WLM]


Chris Moor said:
If Live Mail is so great why didnt it ship with IE 7 or come installed with
Vista Ultimate?
Why has yahoo exceeded you in compatability with your own accounts?
Let alone help file support and has not failed once to work over the last 2
months for the same price?
I think you have really made a bonehead deployment.
MS has market share for catering to the home user and totally made it a
convoluted if not impossible mess for any parochial user to gain access
without ludicrous demands for more money than the 3rd party vendors?
I'm a low end programmer and I even recognize good AJAX controls and Live
isn't using them right at all.

:

In Windows Mail, there's no way to turn off the name & email address when
you compose a message.
However, Windows Live Mail only shows the name.

If you are sending to multiple recipients and wish not to share their
addresses, use the BCC: field
All they see is Undisclosed-Recipient:



message ,.Good Morning,
I am having trouble with sending emails. I had my old account set up to
where when you sent emails to whom ever in the address box only their name
will appear not the email address . I LIKE TO KEEP MY EMAIL ADDYS PRIVATE.
i
only like the p
erson's name or names showing in the inbox which I want the email to go
too.
Thanks for your time.
ROC
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
Back
Top