P
Peter
I need crack for funhouse photo prog.
HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELP
HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELP
D
dszady
Peter said:
So go down to the corner and buy some. Or did you mean you want to take a
picture of the crack of your ass down at the "funhouse"?
T
Terry
Peter de Lang Replied By Email Saying:
Well that wasn't very pleasant now, was it? You ask a wholly off topic
question in an inappropriate group and get a civil response pointing
you towards an appropriate group and you decide this warrants an
abusive mail to the civil poster.
Another civil point: you format a post to a.b.c like the one you
posted here and you will be laughed at.
A final civil point: your mail to me was intrusive and abusive. This
is a formal request to you to NOT mail me again under any
circumstances.
Well that wasn't very pleasant now, was it? You ask a wholly off topic
question in an inappropriate group and get a civil response pointing
you towards an appropriate group and you decide this warrants an
abusive mail to the civil poster.
Another civil point: you format a post to a.b.c like the one you
posted here and you will be laughed at.
A final civil point: your mail to me was intrusive and abusive. This
is a formal request to you to NOT mail me again under any
circumstances.
A
Alan
A
Alan
Terry said:
It may have been an accident.
The OP doesn't inspire much confidencein being able to deal with complex, cognitive tasks... like
distinguishing between a Reply and a Reply Group button.
T
Terry
Alan said:It may have been an accident.
in being able to deal with complex, cognitive tasks... like
distinguishing between a Reply and a Reply Group button.
If it was an accident then he accidentally mailed me with '****
off.crazy gaymotherfucker' after my formal request to him to not mail
me.
I know that my ISP would take a dim view of me mailing someone having
been told my mails are unwanted; it remains to be seen what home.nl's
policy is on this
S
Susan Bugher
Terry said:
That's not PROOF - just circumstantial evidence (like the trout in the
milk).
Susan
T
Terry
Susan said:
He's gone a bit quiet now; perhaps his mum has a keylogger and has
sent him to bed early.
If you put a top hat on Thoreau, would he look like Lincoln?
http://www.transcendentalists.com/1thorea.html
T
Terry
Susan said:
When? ffs
Gottcha!
exits to the sound of maniacal laughter . . .
Grrr...
*waits for proof*
S
Susan Bugher
Terry said:
ffs?
*trout in the milk* and *top hat on Thoreau etc.* were both used to
imply the same idea
so in effect you said the same thing I said and *da rules* say you lose.
*da rules* -> *I* get to make them up as we go along.
more maniacal laughter is heard in the background . . .
Susan
T
Terry
Susan said:
Nonsense. You posted the 'trout' quote and I responded with an URL to
a Thoreau site which had a pic of him. I reckoned that with a hat on
he would look like Lincoln... how you can infer a 'gottcha' (sic) from
this passes all human understanding. ffs
Absolute, total, complete and utter piffle.
S
Susan Bugher
Terry said:
hmmm, thought you were also pursuing the circumstantial evidence bit . .
..
okay, I'll concede . . . this time . . .
<grumble> ffs . . .
probably a *trap* I fell into . . .
must look more carefully next time . . .
Susan
T
Terry
Susan said:
Nope. Hey... a word wrapped ellipsis
okay, I'll concede . . . this time . . .
Jolly good
Better than manic laughter
Nope; an honest misunderstanding... if I set traps I like to spring
them late into a thread