nivrip said:
You're quite right Flops, there are some nice stations about in the rural areas. There are several on the line to Whitby which are very tidy - but none of them have the beautiful tilework on them and I'm sure that if they did they would be vandalised eventually.
You're sure are you?
Ever thought you may be wrong and that in ten years time those stations - or the majority of them - would be graffitti free if they had tiles? They do happen you know, good things.
I always try and see the good side of things, I try to stay opitmistic and also harbour the perhaps rather foolish view that if enough folks thought positive, then positive stuff would occur.
Of course, I always get let down but hey, I refuse to be a grumpy git who only sees bad and is pessimistic.
I've said it before, I'll say it again, the majority of kids are ok, only takes a few bad 'uns to tar the lot of them with the same brush.
Yes, there are bad peeps about, and yes, I actually do blame most of it on the parents, but not always, and I'd hazard a guess those people don't get any better as they get older, they just lose their 'courage' to disfigure nice places, mostly cos they realise the consequences, they could get nicked.
Of course, the good maintenance and appearance of any rail station is largely dependent on it's staff. Graffitti artists do tend to go for run down sites, if they see a place is looking good and well looked after, in my experience they do tend to leave it alone.
If the staff adopt a 'couldn't care less' attitude and let their patch slide downhill, vandals will likely move in.
You see, there's two sides to every story.
I hate graffitti with a passion, by the way, and think that all vandals who practice it should be stripped to their underwear in public, tied up and sprayed head to foot with hard-to-remove paint. That may dissuade them from more spraying.
Of course, if I done that I'd probably be charged with assault and slung in Wandsworth but hey, I can dream
But I'm still positive, I refuse to join an army of moaners