PING Susan

  • Thread starter Thread starter Garrett
  • Start date Start date
G

Garrett

Hi Susan,

Not sure you saw this, but the idea of a "Hall of Fame" for
Pricelessware items that have been inducted 5 times or greater has been
suggested.

Was wondering what you think of this and if maybe you'd like to like to
maybe run it through the a.c.f. paces?

Thanks,
-Garrett
 
Garrett said:
Hi Susan,

Not sure you saw this, but the idea of a "Hall of Fame" for
Pricelessware items that have been inducted 5 times or greater has been
suggested.

Was wondering what you think of this and if maybe you'd like to like to
maybe run it through the a.c.f. paces?
Click to expand...

Hi Garrett,

I think we should have a discussion about the annual lists first - make
sure there is agreement - and post the "final" lists for future reference.

IMO the *first* Pricelessware List is PL2000 - aince the Pricelessware
name was first suggested in mid-December 1999.

I'll post my list for each year and/or a combined list. The combined
list contains 589 names so I thought I'd ask for your preference
*before* posting. You can do the same or compare your lists to mine and
tell me where we differ.

The cumulative list presents one additional item for consideration:
which programs are truly sucessor programs?

Let's get the lists into agreement and then move on to the "Hall of
Fame" discussion.

Susan
 
Susan Bugher wrote:

[snip]
Let's get the lists into agreement and then move on to the "Hall of
Fame" discussion.

Susan
Click to expand...

I'll try to remember to bring up after December, unless someone else
beats me to it.

-Garrett
 
"Garrett" <[email protected]> wrote:
Click to expand...
Hi Susan,
Click to expand...
Not sure you saw this, but the idea of a "Hall of Fame" for
Pricelessware items that have been inducted 5 times or greater has been
suggested.
Click to expand...
Was wondering what you think of this and if maybe you'd like to like to
maybe run it through the a.c.f. paces?
Click to expand...

Once identified, (after the 2005 vote?) it will be good to archive the programs
to provide a stable link. I have the space, and bandwidth for nominal sized
programs. Open Office sized programs might present a bandwidth problem though.
Or, maybe many of us can archive them and get a great spread on them.

I'll try to archive them either way the project goes. I think many will be using
98/98SE for years to come and it's a shame to see good programs slip through the
cracks. The larger archives might keep these, or move on to newer, possibly
crippled, or shareware versions. The smaller archives, well, it can be hit and
miss as far as depending on a download source.
 
Once identified, (after the 2005 vote?) it will be good to archive the
programs to provide a stable link. I have the space, and bandwidth for
nominal sized programs. Open Office sized programs might present a
bandwidth problem though. Or, maybe many of us can archive them and
get a great spread on them.

I'll try to archive them either way the project goes. I think many
will be using 98/98SE for years to come and it's a shame to see good
programs slip through the cracks. The larger archives might keep
these, or move on to newer, possibly crippled, or shareware versions.
The smaller archives, well, it can be hit and miss as far as depending
on a download source.
Click to expand...

I think that's a good idea. I'd be willing also to provide space. :)
 
Back
Top