(e-mail address removed).?.I.don't.com wrote in
As usual Raid changes links and the subject. The subject of this post
is Pierre Vandevenne's assessment of Raid:
As usual, in a failing attempt to critize me, your again giving me credit
for a post I didn't make. Are you going to do this each time you use a
less than perfectly reliable source material/misread said source material
and someone else (not me) calls you on it? Will you next accuse them of
either being me (I don't use an anonymous remailer) or a friend because
they found a flaw in your post and responded to you?
I know you wouldn't talk like you do here with the words you use about me
and what you called my mom in person. No civilized individual would need
to resort to such lame schoolyard antics. The fact you still post
anonymously because you feel the need to protect yourself from me, even
after seeing what I look like (and thanks for the goatee comment, I
hadn't shaved when the picture was taken) only tells me that your a real
coward in real life who won't take any responsibility for his words,
probably because if you mouthed off in person like you do here you'd get
your arse kicked good by whoever you smarted off too.
His words in all fairness could be used verbatim to describe you and
these posts of yours lately. You are certainly being dishonest with your
comments and claims.
You've spent a great deal of time flooding various newsgroups I hangout
in, digging up articles, quoting posts out of context, doing basically
anything you can to try and paint me as some crazy nutjob who's only out
to hurt people. You're failing in this task. It's gotten to the point
now, where I actually find you humourous because it's very easy to take
each post you've made apart if I wanted to take the time. I could respond
in great detail, as I have here with almost all of them.
I'm not doing this for you, but for the readers, so they too can see you
for what you are; it goes both ways.
