R
Robert Germann
Ok, I ran into this before and never know what to do about it.
First Question:
What is the deal with inserting a photo and being able to edit it?
What I mean is that I insert a photo from file into my powerpoint
presentation. Later when I want to adjust it, I can right click on it.
But what boggles me is that some photos have the option to use the
photo editor (powerpoint is treating it as a photo) and other photos,
inserted the same way, do not have that option (powerpoint is treating
it as an object).
Second Question:
What is a good pixel size for a photo in a presentation? My new job
entails creating presentations based on older presentaions. A lot of
times, I need to use a photo that was in a previous presentation. Some
of these presentations are small in the number of slides but
mega-large in file size. I started looking at the orginal size of the
photo verses the scaled down size. A lot of the photos have orginal
sizes of 22 inches by 16 inches, scaled down to 13% - 20 %. I
understand that the larger the size of the orginal, the better the
image looks, but there has got to be a middle ground where I can have
a good looking image but still keep the file size down. What are your
suggestions?
Thanks
Rob
First Question:
What is the deal with inserting a photo and being able to edit it?
What I mean is that I insert a photo from file into my powerpoint
presentation. Later when I want to adjust it, I can right click on it.
But what boggles me is that some photos have the option to use the
photo editor (powerpoint is treating it as a photo) and other photos,
inserted the same way, do not have that option (powerpoint is treating
it as an object).
Second Question:
What is a good pixel size for a photo in a presentation? My new job
entails creating presentations based on older presentaions. A lot of
times, I need to use a photo that was in a previous presentation. Some
of these presentations are small in the number of slides but
mega-large in file size. I started looking at the orginal size of the
photo verses the scaled down size. A lot of the photos have orginal
sizes of 22 inches by 16 inches, scaled down to 13% - 20 %. I
understand that the larger the size of the orginal, the better the
image looks, but there has got to be a middle ground where I can have
a good looking image but still keep the file size down. What are your
suggestions?
Thanks
Rob