Justin said:
For a desktop PC (MicroATX) that will be around 450 watts - should I
look for a Passive PFC power supply? I researches what PFC is and
the passive is better from what I can tell.
First google response I get is:
The preferable type of PFC is Active Power Factor Correction (Active
PFC) since it provides more efficient power frequency. Because Active
PFC uses a circuit to correct power factor, Active PFC is able to
generate a theoretical power factor of over 95%. Active Power Factor
Correction also markedly diminishes total harmonics, automatically
corrects for AC input voltage, and is capable of a full range of input
voltage. Since Active PFC is the more complex method of Power Factor
Correction, it is more expensive to produce an Active PFC power supply.
The most common type of PFC is Passive Power Factor Correction
(Passive PFC). Passive PFC uses a capacitive filter at the AC input to
correct poor power factor. Passive PFC may be affected when
environmental vibration occurs. Passive PFC requires that the AC input
voltage be set manually. Passive PFC also does not use the full energy
potential of the AC line.
Frankly, I don't understand any of that. What I DO understand is that
450 Watts is a LOT of power for a computer, especially in a microATX
case. What is going to be in there -- a portable max gaming system?!?