J
John
I have a small network, 100MB switched, with 4 nodes. The server is
Win2003EE, clients are XP Pro.
A couple/three week's ago, when browsing a folder of JPG images, performance
was zippy. Now, it takes 30 seconds or more for a single JPG image to come
up (image size averages about 1.4MB). During this time, nothing unusual on
the server in terms of memory, CPU, or disk. And, network utilization stays
under 5%.
The same files shared peer-to-peer between the two XP Pro boxes is extremely
fast (same as before). The same files accessed directly on the Windows 2003
console from it's own directory is extremely fast. It is only when the
files
are accessed from XP to 2003, and only recently that this started. I used
Network Monitor to capture packets, and didn't see anything obvious (though
I
admittedly am not an expert at reading packet captures).
Did a recent security patch change TCP Window Size parameters or anything
similar to cause this performance degradation?
I have seen other reported problems on the Internet reporting JPG
performance is slow. I believe it has nothing to do with JPG's themselves.
However, the way that XP caches thumbnails and things causes a lot of data
transfer over the network (more than say, streaming same-size MP3 files).
My
belief is this is a networking issue, independent of file type. But I could
be wrong.
Thanks in advance,
/John
Win2003EE, clients are XP Pro.
A couple/three week's ago, when browsing a folder of JPG images, performance
was zippy. Now, it takes 30 seconds or more for a single JPG image to come
up (image size averages about 1.4MB). During this time, nothing unusual on
the server in terms of memory, CPU, or disk. And, network utilization stays
under 5%.
The same files shared peer-to-peer between the two XP Pro boxes is extremely
fast (same as before). The same files accessed directly on the Windows 2003
console from it's own directory is extremely fast. It is only when the
files
are accessed from XP to 2003, and only recently that this started. I used
Network Monitor to capture packets, and didn't see anything obvious (though
I
admittedly am not an expert at reading packet captures).
Did a recent security patch change TCP Window Size parameters or anything
similar to cause this performance degradation?
I have seen other reported problems on the Internet reporting JPG
performance is slow. I believe it has nothing to do with JPG's themselves.
However, the way that XP caches thumbnails and things causes a lot of data
transfer over the network (more than say, streaming same-size MP3 files).
My
belief is this is a networking issue, independent of file type. But I could
be wrong.
Thanks in advance,
/John