Performance cost of casting

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joel
  • Start date Start date
It's more of an academic question of casting vs. Convert.To(). I assume
the "small" performance hit is a typecheck on the object being cast.
 
Joel Wilson said:
It's more of an academic question of casting vs. Convert.To(). I assume
the "small" performance hit is a typecheck on the object being cast.

Yes. Using the "as" operator (for reference types) is marginally faster
in the current CLR, and certainly using "as" and then a nullity check
is faster than "is" and then a cast, but most of the time it shouldn't
have any significant impact.
 
Back
Top