parts in C#

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bill McCarthy
  • Start date Start date
B

Bill McCarthy

Actually it doesn't as has already been said. You see in .NET you can have
parts written in C#, and parts written in VB.NET.
 
Bill McCarthy said:
Actually it doesn't as has already been said. You see in .NET you can have
parts written in C#, and parts written in VB.NET.
Click to expand...

Though true, to whom are you posting these? I see nine separate threads
started by you on random topics in the last few minutes.
 
Family Tree Mike said:
Though true, to whom are you posting these? I see nine separate threads
started by you on random topics in the last few minutes.
Click to expand...

I don't think that <[email protected]> is Bill's e-mail address.

Kindly ignore spam instead of replying to it because this will make removal
from the news servers more complicated.
 
Herfried K. Wagner said:
I don't think that <[email protected]> is Bill's e-mail address.

Kindly ignore spam instead of replying to it because this will make
removal from the news servers more complicated.
Click to expand...

Herfried,

You are correct that these did not come from Bill. The Individual
responsible mistakenly posted the same/similar threads to the vb classic
group earlier and actually took credit for it and is proud of himself. He
also said that he would post them here as well.

Hopefully, they will be detected as SPAM and will be removed.
 
It's Mike Williams trying to post as Bill, thinking it's going to give him a
bad name.

The really funny part? He posted all of this to
microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion *first*, because he was too stupid to
remember which news group he wanted to spam. Says a lot about his
intelligence really.

Definition of Irony:

1. He gets mad at anyone answering .NET questions in a VB6 newsgroup

2. He then goes on a spam attack, except he spams the VB6 ng instead of his
intended target (the .NET ng)

If he can't get something as simple as that correct, then it's no wonder he
finds VB.NET too complicated to upgrade to...
 
Hopefully, they will be detected as SPAM and will be removed.
Click to expand...

Well they've certainly not managed to detect McCarthy's numerous malicious
messages in the VB6 group as spam, which they very definitely are, so I
don't see the few recent extract's you've had to put up with should be an
exception.

Mike
 
It's Mike Williams trying to post as Bill, thinking it's
going to give him a bad name.
Click to expand...

Nobody needs to give McCarthy a bad name, Clark. He's already done that
himself, as have you yourself. Both of you have been trolling the VB6 group
for some time in your deliberate attempts to destroy it, although you have
not been doing so for quite as long as your accomplice.

Mike
 
He's doing it with my posts as well.

-Scott M.


Alex Clark said:
It's Mike Williams trying to post as Bill, thinking it's going to give him
a bad name.

The really funny part? He posted all of this to
microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion *first*, because he was too stupid
to remember which news group he wanted to spam. Says a lot about his
intelligence really.

Definition of Irony:

1. He gets mad at anyone answering .NET questions in a VB6 newsgroup

2. He then goes on a spam attack, except he spams the VB6 ng instead of
his intended target (the .NET ng)

If he can't get something as simple as that correct, then it's no wonder
he finds VB.NET too complicated to upgrade to...
Click to expand...
 
He's doing it with my posts as well.
-Scott M.
Click to expand...

Just trying to be helpful, Scotty. You seem to have posted all your VB.Net
rubbish in the VB6 group by mistake, so I thought I would post a small
extract from some of them into the correct group for you. Hope you're
pleased. Would you like me to post the others for you?

Mike
 
Back
Top