Woger said:
Yes but One large Partition is a problem when you wish to Defage..
Why would you want to "defage"? Fragmentation is slows file systems
down somewhat, but if you are using windows there is *nothing* you can
do about it. Running a defragmenter helps a bit in the short term, but
the next time windows makes a file, it will scatter it almost randomly
over the disk, just as before. It will do this even if the partition is
almost empty, or perfectly defragmented and compacted. And of course,
defragmenting software fails to do any significant defragmentation if
the disk is more than about 50% full.
There is only one way to get a reasonable defragmentation with windows -
you move *all* the files onto another partition, then move them all back
again. From that viewpoint, multiple partitions can be useful.
Although this obviously won't work on the system partition, it will work
if you have a separate partition for data files.
Another thing to remember about partitions is that you get better
resilience to failure with multiple partitions. Contrary to popular
belief, physical harddisk failures are relatively rare - but logical
corruption of windows file systems is easy to get during unexpected
resets, crashes, etc. (NTFS is harder to corrupt, but not impossible).
It is the system partition that is by far the most likely to get such
corruption - if you keep your data files on a separate partition, they
are more likely to survive a disaster. It is also much easier if you
later want to re-install the OS and/or programs in the system partition
- your data is left undisturbed. Ideally, of course, you keep your data
on a networked server running a more reliable OS, rather than the
windows box - but that's another story.
Of course, it all depends on what you are doing with the machine. If it
is a games machine with nothing more important than a few saved games,
you won't get any benefits from separate partitions.