H
howard schwartz
I sysad pro has warned me about savepart ghost and other programs that image a
partition or disk to a file: If the original partition or disk has physical
problems such as bad sectors, and the disk, for example, automatically maps
date to spare good sectors on the disk -- you may find your restore does not
work.
That is, if the physical partition/disk is not exactly the same as it was when
you made the image -- one can imagine there may be trouble when one does
the restore.
Anyone have any experience with such a problem? Sounds like it makes a
good procedure problematic. The pro recommended file backup because of this.
The advantage of sector by sector copying is that, if your OS fails, you can
restore the whole thing using software from a floppy, without first
reinstalling the OS, so you have access to your (windows) backup utility.
This may no longer be the case with NTFS becoming the new standard
file system on disk. Copying or restoring backups from FAT media or other
media to NTFS, may be a problem in several ways.
partition or disk to a file: If the original partition or disk has physical
problems such as bad sectors, and the disk, for example, automatically maps
date to spare good sectors on the disk -- you may find your restore does not
work.
That is, if the physical partition/disk is not exactly the same as it was when
you made the image -- one can imagine there may be trouble when one does
the restore.
Anyone have any experience with such a problem? Sounds like it makes a
good procedure problematic. The pro recommended file backup because of this.
The advantage of sector by sector copying is that, if your OS fails, you can
restore the whole thing using software from a floppy, without first
reinstalling the OS, so you have access to your (windows) backup utility.
This may no longer be the case with NTFS becoming the new standard
file system on disk. Copying or restoring backups from FAT media or other
media to NTFS, may be a problem in several ways.