?
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?BenOne=A9?=
Hi all,
Using some ISO standard photo patten Canon claim you will get the following
number of pages from the cartridges in the i9950:
photo magenta: 280
photo cyan: 380
yellow: 540
magenta: 790
cyan: 1100
black: 1100
red: 2300
green: 2300
A friend as the i950, and reckons he managed to get about 50 pages from the
photo magenta cartridge, and siginificantly less pages than Canon quotes from
all the other colours too. His doesn't have the red and green, but seeing as
they barely get used compared to the photo magenta, photo cyan, and yellow, it
would seem they don't make much difference to the ink usage of the i9950 if
Canon's figures are anything to go on with regard to ratios.
It would seem the ISO "standard photo pattern" test is a load of rubbish and not
worth anything to consumers, particularly those wishing to estimate the cost of
using a printer in a business.
My friend thinks it will cost about AU$1 (US$0.70) per A4 page in ink. Does that
seem reasonable?
Using some ISO standard photo patten Canon claim you will get the following
number of pages from the cartridges in the i9950:
photo magenta: 280
photo cyan: 380
yellow: 540
magenta: 790
cyan: 1100
black: 1100
red: 2300
green: 2300
A friend as the i950, and reckons he managed to get about 50 pages from the
photo magenta cartridge, and siginificantly less pages than Canon quotes from
all the other colours too. His doesn't have the red and green, but seeing as
they barely get used compared to the photo magenta, photo cyan, and yellow, it
would seem they don't make much difference to the ink usage of the i9950 if
Canon's figures are anything to go on with regard to ratios.
It would seem the ISO "standard photo pattern" test is a load of rubbish and not
worth anything to consumers, particularly those wishing to estimate the cost of
using a printer in a business.
My friend thinks it will cost about AU$1 (US$0.70) per A4 page in ink. Does that
seem reasonable?