H
HDJulie
I have this motherboard & until now have had the hard drive attached to the
primary ide cable. The system shows it to be UDMA 5. I ran SiSoft Sandra
on it & it benchmarked around 33. I decided to try the drive on the Raid
controller (Promise FastTrak133 Lite) which is supposed to be an ATA133
controller & ran Sandra again. This time I get anywhere from 29 - 32. I
thought that ATA133 was UDMA 6 & I thought that this controller would make
the drive faster. I am not using the RAID capabilities of the controller --
I want it only for UDMA. I've been doing some research & have seen mention
of the Lumberjack bios hacks. So, I have a few questions:
1) Shouldn't the RAID controller be faster than the IDE controller?
2) How can I tell what UDMA the system is using for the drive while on the
RAID controller. I don't see that anywhere in Device Manager.
3) Would using a Lumberjack bios make the controller faster & if so, which
one would I want -- Full Raid, or PureUDMA?
Thanks,
Julie
primary ide cable. The system shows it to be UDMA 5. I ran SiSoft Sandra
on it & it benchmarked around 33. I decided to try the drive on the Raid
controller (Promise FastTrak133 Lite) which is supposed to be an ATA133
controller & ran Sandra again. This time I get anywhere from 29 - 32. I
thought that ATA133 was UDMA 6 & I thought that this controller would make
the drive faster. I am not using the RAID capabilities of the controller --
I want it only for UDMA. I've been doing some research & have seen mention
of the Lumberjack bios hacks. So, I have a few questions:
1) Shouldn't the RAID controller be faster than the IDE controller?
2) How can I tell what UDMA the system is using for the drive while on the
RAID controller. I don't see that anywhere in Device Manager.
3) Would using a Lumberjack bios make the controller faster & if so, which
one would I want -- Full Raid, or PureUDMA?
Thanks,
Julie