J
Jessica Loriena
I've noticed that it is considerably slower to boot Win2K on my
P4P800-E Deluxe with Pentium 4 2.8 HT than in my other lower
performance systems. It takes about 20 more seconds until the logon
screen. My specs:
***************
Asus P4P800-E Deluxe
P4 HT 2.8 GHz (1 MB L2 cache)
RAID disabled
HT enabled (not officially supported on Win2K but works fine)
2x256 MB DDR 400 Samsung (Dual channel enabled)
80 GB ATA100 HD
***************
Other System:
Asus CUSL2-C
P3 866 MHz
No RAID / No HT
2x256 MB SDRAM 133 MHz
80 GB ATA100 HD
Both installations of Win2K have very similar options enabled. With HT
enabled, Win2K sees the system as dual processor. (Maybe this makes it
slower to boot??)
I know that higher specs isn't supposed to make Win2K boot much
faster, but SLOWER?? Does anyone know what may be wrong??
P4P800-E Deluxe with Pentium 4 2.8 HT than in my other lower
performance systems. It takes about 20 more seconds until the logon
screen. My specs:
***************
Asus P4P800-E Deluxe
P4 HT 2.8 GHz (1 MB L2 cache)
RAID disabled
HT enabled (not officially supported on Win2K but works fine)
2x256 MB DDR 400 Samsung (Dual channel enabled)
80 GB ATA100 HD
***************
Other System:
Asus CUSL2-C
P3 866 MHz
No RAID / No HT
2x256 MB SDRAM 133 MHz
80 GB ATA100 HD
Both installations of Win2K have very similar options enabled. With HT
enabled, Win2K sees the system as dual processor. (Maybe this makes it
slower to boot??)
I know that higher specs isn't supposed to make Win2K boot much
faster, but SLOWER?? Does anyone know what may be wrong??