P
Paladin
I would agree with the editor's conclusion: "for a user looking for a very
fast board at stock speed the P4C800-E is great". I have run the board at
stock settings, no overclocking, for a couple of months now, rock solid with
absolutely no issues. By contrast, ths MSI counterpart suffered many issues
on first release, possibly resolved by later bios releases. The Northbridge
fan and voltage questions only become relevant if you are going to
overclock: passive cooling has proved totally adequate for me. (If you were
worried, why not add a more substantial heatsink to the Asus board?)
Contrary to the article, with a little care I found no problems routing
cables for good overall cooling, especially using rounded IDE cables for
optical drives and flat SATA cables for the hard drives. All this in an
Antec case designed for low noise rather than optimal cooling, and despite
the fact that I play games for hours on end running a hot high-end graphics
card and P4 3.0 cpu.
fast board at stock speed the P4C800-E is great". I have run the board at
stock settings, no overclocking, for a couple of months now, rock solid with
absolutely no issues. By contrast, ths MSI counterpart suffered many issues
on first release, possibly resolved by later bios releases. The Northbridge
fan and voltage questions only become relevant if you are going to
overclock: passive cooling has proved totally adequate for me. (If you were
worried, why not add a more substantial heatsink to the Asus board?)
Contrary to the article, with a little care I found no problems routing
cables for good overall cooling, especially using rounded IDE cables for
optical drives and flat SATA cables for the hard drives. All this in an
Antec case designed for low noise rather than optimal cooling, and despite
the fact that I play games for hours on end running a hot high-end graphics
card and P4 3.0 cpu.