Folkert Rienstra said:
Indeed there isn't. I expected the free space to be recorded here
Where exactly? Free space (I prefer unallocated space) isn't recorded,
that's why it's free space. Free space is what remains outside of areas that
are claimed by a partition.
since when I cloned a smaller harddrive to a bigger one, Fdisk still
reported it to be the smaller drive's capacity and no free space.
That's not an Fdisk thing, it's a BIOS thing. Before you ask; yes 'thing' is
an existing technical term.
It would appear that the drive's seen capacity is recorded somewhere
at partitioning time
It isn't, partitions are defined at 'partitioning time'. Is this the same
Folkert who always tells people to get their facts straight by referring to
the various ATA and whatever specs he can come up with?
but now that I think about it, it may just have
been because I had an extended partition and that finalizes the used
space as far as DOS/Windows is concerned.
Having an off day? I quote OP: "The BIOS limits the system to seeing only
8GB ". We're talking about a BIOS limitation here. Also, how DOS sees a disk
or Windows are entirely different matters.
That is what they all say .....
And you don't wonder why they do?
but please read back to us what it says under "Set Type" for type 00.
Read back from where exactly? Are you referring to Ptedit? If so, you humor
me and you read it back to us. I bet without even looking that Ptedit will
not mention a 'free space partition' anywhere.
Odd that Fdisk seems to think different if you look in the right place.
Where?
On the other hand, if you add a partition, it will happily take the place
of the edited entry, as I intended it to work.
If that works, then I consider that an Fdisk bug. It implies that I could
edit the partition table to add numbers (start and end values) to an unused
entry that exceed the physical capacity of the physical disk, and that after
that Fdisk would happily create partitions in non existing space.
And why would you, let Fdisk do that, it will do it proper.
When Fdisk is run in Windows, the BIOS limitation doesn't apply so there
would be no need for your Ptedit voodoo.
Now you're talking.
Since he doesn have an extended partition (well, he didn't mention it)
just using Fdisk under Windows might do it for him.
Yes, even without all your ptedit hocus pocus. However the issue that the
BIOS does not support disks > 8 Gb remains.