Outlook 2003 Calendar, to be allowed on the right, as in 2002

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

The behavious of Calendar in 2002, is much better than in 2003, whereby
calendar would open in the right pane, not part of the folder hierarchy.
When you have a long folder hierarchy, and you click on calendar in 2003, it
squashes the folder list; getting back to a particular folder is not straight
forward.
In 2002, the behaviour was best for navigation and viewing: click on
calendar, the folder tree remains in place, you get up to 4 month worth in
the right pane, without messing the folder tree. click again on the tree,
calendar pane disappears; now in 2003, it's a mess (when you have long folder
tree).

Equally, the behaviour of http mail in outlook 2002, was much better, when
you work offline. In 2003, you can no longer manage it offline, as in 2002..

----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.

http://www.microsoft.com/office/com...6d2fe&dg=microsoft.public.outlook.calendaring
 
So, do you actually think that Microsoft will retrograde Outlook because of
this suggestion? I seriously doubt it.

--
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]

Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. All
unsolicited mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without
reading.

After furious head scratching, Jad A. asked:

| The behavious of Calendar in 2002, is much better than in 2003,
| whereby calendar would open in the right pane, not part of the folder
| hierarchy. When you have a long folder hierarchy, and you click on
| calendar in 2003, it squashes the folder list; getting back to a
| particular folder is not straight forward.
| In 2002, the behaviour was best for navigation and viewing: click on
| calendar, the folder tree remains in place, you get up to 4 month
| worth in the right pane, without messing the folder tree. click again
| on the tree, calendar pane disappears; now in 2003, it's a mess (when
| you have long folder tree).
|
| Equally, the behaviour of http mail in outlook 2002, was much better,
| when you work offline. In 2003, you can no longer manage it offline,
| as in 2002..
|
| ----------------
| This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
| suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click
| the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the
| button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft
| Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane.
|
|
http://www.microsoft.com/office/com...6d2fe&dg=microsoft.public.outlook.calendaring
 
Is it helpful to put down people's suggestiosn after they have taken the time
to communicate their concerns? The comments made by Jad A. are valid and
Microsoft *should* consider them.

Why do you think MS encourages feedback and hosts this Q&A on their site?
So they can monitor the issues.

I agree with Jad A. and find the functionality of Outlook *degrading* with
each new release.

Susan
 
1. Use the folder list if you don't like the navigation pane
2. if by '4 month' you mean the small navigation calendars, you can show
them on the left or right side and show as many or as few as you want.
3. http is going the way of the dinosaur.
4. outlook 2003 will not be reprogrammed - it's outlook 2007 for the next
couple of years.








susanmarie said:
Is it helpful to put down people's suggestiosn after they have taken the
time
to communicate their concerns? The comments made by Jad A. are valid and
Microsoft *should* consider them.

Why do you think MS encourages feedback and hosts this Q&A on their site?
So they can monitor the issues.

I agree with Jad A. and find the functionality of Outlook *degrading*
with
each new release.

Susan

Milly Staples - MVP Outlook said:
So, do you actually think that Microsoft will retrograde Outlook because
of
this suggestion? I seriously doubt it.

--
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]

Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. All
unsolicited mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without
reading.

After furious head scratching, Jad A. asked:

| The behavious of Calendar in 2002, is much better than in 2003,
| whereby calendar would open in the right pane, not part of the folder
| hierarchy. When you have a long folder hierarchy, and you click on
| calendar in 2003, it squashes the folder list; getting back to a
| particular folder is not straight forward.
| In 2002, the behaviour was best for navigation and viewing: click on
| calendar, the folder tree remains in place, you get up to 4 month
| worth in the right pane, without messing the folder tree. click again
| on the tree, calendar pane disappears; now in 2003, it's a mess (when
| you have long folder tree).
|
| Equally, the behaviour of http mail in outlook 2002, was much better,
| when you work offline. In 2003, you can no longer manage it offline,
| as in 2002..
|
| ----------------
| This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
| suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click
| the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the
| button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft
| Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane.
|
|
http://www.microsoft.com/office/com...6d2fe&dg=microsoft.public.outlook.calendaring
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
Back
Top