OT: why are Ad-Aware & Spybot needed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Robert Kim
  • Start date Start date
R

Robert Kim

Hi, all. I hope nobody minds a dumb question but after every Internet
session, I go to the Cookies folder and delete all cookies. Afterwards,
I've tried running Ad-Aware and it never picks up any spyware like when I
don't delete the cookies.

If I delete all cookies after every Internet session, is there any reason
to run ad-spyware detection programs such as Ad-Aware and Spybot?

TIA,

Bob
 
Robert Kim said:
Hi, all. I hope nobody minds a dumb question but after every Internet
session, I go to the Cookies folder and delete all cookies. Afterwards,
I've tried running Ad-Aware and it never picks up any spyware like when I
don't delete the cookies.

If I delete all cookies after every Internet session, is there any reason
to run ad-spyware detection programs such as Ad-Aware and Spybot?
For sure, adware and spyware don't only come as cookies.
HK
 
[posted and mailed]

Hi, all. I hope nobody minds a dumb question but after every Internet
session, I go to the Cookies folder and delete all cookies. Afterwards,
I've tried running Ad-Aware and it never picks up any spyware like when I
don't delete the cookies.

If I delete all cookies after every Internet session, is there any reason
to run ad-spyware detection programs such as Ad-Aware and Spybot?

Cookies are just one form of spyware. Here are some resources to get you up
to speed:

http://www.simplythebest.net/info/spyware.html
http://www.pcmag.com/print_article/0,3048,a=39275,00.asp
 
Hi, all. I hope nobody minds a dumb question but after every Internet
session, I go to the Cookies folder and delete all cookies. Afterwards,
I've tried running Ad-Aware and it never picks up any spyware like when I
don't delete the cookies.

If I delete all cookies after every Internet session, is there any reason
to run ad-spyware detection programs such as Ad-Aware and Spybot?

TIA,

Bob
You may want to consider selectively deleting cookies, depending on
your browsing habits.
For instance, I have customized weather reports & TV listings that use
the cookies they put on my PC to keep track of my preferences.
 
You may want to consider selectively deleting cookies, depending on
your browsing habits.
For instance, I have customized weather reports & TV listings that use
the cookies they put on my PC to keep track of my preferences.

Thanks, jim. I think you're right. It's become annoying to have to
re-enter all the info I lose when deleting all cookies.

Bob
 
martedì 13/gen/2004 _Robert Kim_ ha scritto:
Thanks, jim. I think you're right. It's become annoying to have to
re-enter all the info I lose when deleting all cookies.

In order to easily accomplish it, I'd recommend to you WinPatrol, that
maintains the cookies you selected to keep, and shows you all the new
cookies added, allowing you to do with them what you want.
http://www.winpatrol.com/
 
In order to easily accomplish it, I'd recommend to you WinPatrol, that
maintains the cookies you selected to keep, and shows you all the new
cookies added, allowing you to do with them what you want.
http://www.winpatrol.com/

Thank you, MLC. Anything to make life easier is always greatly
appreciated!

Bob
 
If you always delete cookies and temp files, have a tight firewall,
and do a number of other things, you don't need either one -- except
as additional protection. But then if you do everything just right
and keep up with current threats and techniques, you don't need an
antivirus package either. I'm neither that diligent nor sufficiently
knowledgable.

Like antivirus packages, I find Ad-aware and Spybot good
preventatives/insurance. Unlike antivirus packages, they are _not_
intrusive. I run them with priority set to low and with antivirus
check on-access active. The former prevents performance problems; the
latter means that high risk objects are also scanned by my antivirus
much more frequently than would otherwise be the case.
For sure, adware and spyware don't only come as cookies.
HK

For example browser helper objects are frequently used maliciously or
invasively. Ad-aware and Spybot should find most obnoxious BHOs. The
also have other less well known features. Other products provide the
same protection, sometimes even better, but I find Ad-Aware and Spybot
convenient.

These are five features you may find useful.

1. Spybot has a Hosts file option that blocks many obnoxious sites
from even being contacted: www.badsite.com is set to your pc so many
ads are avoided -- or sometimes left blank; the disadvantage is that
you are completely locked out of those sites and may not realize it.

2. Spybot's Immunize option prevents most adware from even installing.
(Strongly recommended.)

3. Spybot also has a Lock Hosts file option that will prevent adware
from working around the prior options as well as prevent most
hijacking.

4. Ad-aware can turn off Windows Messenger Service via a plug-in.
(Strongly recommended unless you specifically need WMS; this is but
one of several ways to do this.) (Note, I think this is still in the
free version. The pay version has several additional features.)

5. Spybot Tools include Active-X, BHO, and startup views that you may
find useful, although you should have a better startup viewer or
manager.

www.pricelessware.org has recommendations for alternative hosts file
managers and startup managers if you are interested. A Google Archive
search of ACF will also yield several discussions.

I hope this answers you question.

BillR
 
If you always delete cookies and temp files, have a tight firewall,
and do a number of other things, you don't need either one -- except
as additional protection. But then if you do everything just right
and keep up with current threats and techniques, you don't need an
antivirus package either. I'm neither that diligent nor sufficiently
knowledgable.

Thank you, BillR. Very educational for a neophyte like me and very much
appreciated info. Interestingly enough, when I delete all cookies,
Ad-Aware doesn't find any ad-/spyware but Spybot still finds some in the
registry, folders, etc. I had assumed they were pretty much the same but
looks like they check for different things.

Bob
 
Oh No - They have two totally different approaches to identifying spyware.
I regularly use them both.

By the way, you should want to get to the point where all these programs
find is the occasional odd cookie. If you've got people in your house who
aren't very aware of safe surfing techniques or who insist on using things
like Kazaa, virus & spyware protection is a must.
 
Thank you, BillR. Very educational for a neophyte like me and very much
appreciated info. Interestingly enough, when I delete all cookies,
Ad-Aware doesn't find any ad-/spyware but Spybot still finds some in the
registry, folders, etc.

Are you sure those are spyware and not just MRUs and/or broken registry
entries?

Aaron (my email is not munged!)
 
(e-mail address removed) (BillR) wrote in

For example browser helper objects are frequently used maliciously or
invasively. Ad-aware and Spybot should find most obnoxious BHOs. The
also have other less well known features. Other products provide the
same protection, sometimes even better, but I find Ad-Aware and Spybot
convenient.

These are five features you may find useful.

1. Spybot has a Hosts file option that blocks many obnoxious sites
from even being contacted: www.badsite.com is set to your pc so many
ads are avoided -- or sometimes left blank; the disadvantage is that
you are completely locked out of those sites and may not realize it.

2. Spybot's Immunize option prevents most adware from even installing.
(Strongly recommended.)

3. Spybot also has a Lock Hosts file option that will prevent adware
from working around the prior options as well as prevent most
hijacking.
5. Spybot Tools include Active-X, BHO, and startup views that you may
find useful, although you should have a better startup viewer or
manager.
6. BHO helper that helps monitors IE downloads.
I hope this answers you question.

BillR



Aaron (my email is not munged!)
 
Back
Top