Grinder said:
Your theory is that Wal-mart is advertising products that Amazon
sells
Both are advertising the same products for precisely the same
price.
so that they can, when ordered from their own website,
Technically speaking, a "website" is computer hardware. Ordering
"from a website" is a common accepted definition that doesn't mean
what you are suggesting. Things are much more fluid than that.
buy them retail from Amazon
Buy them retail? That is more semantics that don't apply in this
situation. Obviously Amazon would not charge Walmart the same for
however many jillion products Walmart buys from Amazon.
Do you really think that just because you see the price, that must
be the price Amazon charges Walmart?
and ship them to their store all for absolutely no margin?
They would split the profit.
Walmart is good at shipping truckloads of products at a time.
Amazon is good at shipping individual products. Walmart has
thousands of storefronts, Amazon has none. Walmart doesn't want to
lose business to Amazon. As long as "site to store" is a popular
option, makes perfect sense for Walmart to enter such a deal with
Amazon.
If you disagree... Your task is to find examples that are
precisely the same price that Walmart does not ship "site to
store".