OT: How effective is Spamcop.net?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Robert Kim
  • Start date Start date
R

Robert Kim

Hi, all. I saw a post in here about Spamcop.net a while back. I've been
trying out the free version and was wondering if it is worth upgrading to
the paid version. Is it effective? Any experiences, please post them.
TIA. Are there any other spam reporting services? I can't killfile them
because of the very old newsreader I use which has no filter capabilities
so I might as well report them.

Bob
 
Robert Kim typed:
Hi, all. I saw a post in here about Spamcop.net a while back. I've
been trying out the free version and was wondering if it is worth
upgrading to the paid version. Is it effective? Any experiences,
please post them. TIA. Are there any other spam reporting services?
I can't killfile them because of the very old newsreader I use which
has no filter capabilities so I might as well report them.

SpamCop.net is very effective. SpamCop reporting service is the best.
 
Hi, all. I saw a post in here about Spamcop.net a while back. I've been
trying out the free version and was wondering if it is worth upgrading to
the paid version. Is it effective? Any experiences, please post them.
TIA. Are there any other spam reporting services? I can't killfile them
because of the very old newsreader I use which has no filter capabilities
so I might as well report them.

If Spamcop bounces back e-mail to the sender, it won't work in most cases.
May as well just use a filter at the pop server level. Less Internet
congestion that way.

Bob

Remove "kins" from address to reply.
 
If Spamcop bounces back e-mail to the sender, it won't work in most cases.
May as well just use a filter at the pop server level. Less Internet
congestion that way.


Thanks for the suggestion, Bob. Unfortunately, I use Pine which doesn't
use POP. It has no filter capability.

Bob
 
Back
Top