OT Amazon to begin charging state sales tax

  • Thread starter Thread starter John Doe
  • Start date Start date
The Loan Arranger said:
I live in NY and Amazon has been charging me sales tax for quite some time.

There are a number of states that are already charging sales tax through Amazon. South Carolina hasn't yet, but with the
construction of a new distribution center here or in Georgia, I'm sure it won't be long. We have to claim online
purchases on our state tax returns anyhow, but I'm sure not everyone does that, nor do they claim everything that was
bought on line during the year.
 
I live in NY and Amazon has been charging me sales tax for quite some time.

They're after a consistent regulatory tax bases, not one for NY and
another for CA. At the time of exemptions, it was deemed too imposing
for an online merchant to bear an onus of recording and imposing every
state's tax vagaries. "Brick and Mortar" merchants, with a specific
state presence and business infrastructure, were the exceptions. With
nearly a decade since past and the economy compounded and presently in
Hell's Handbasket, however, the writing is on the wall. Amazon is
trying to save itself from the surrounding morass of state issues by
now appealing to decidedly better interests by supporting a higher law
of the land, at the federal level, for a governing tax guideline
applicable and encompassing to all states. It may not be happening
until, according to how political agendas are rated, 2014, and
ramifications from such as EBAY remain as yet partial and antagonistic
uncertainties.
 
They're after a consistent regulatory tax bases, not one for NY and
another for CA. At the time of exemptions, it was deemed too imposing
for an online merchant to bear an onus of recording and imposing every
state's tax vagaries. "Brick and Mortar" merchants, with a specific
state presence and business infrastructure, were the exceptions. With
nearly a decade since past and the economy compounded and presently in
Hell's Handbasket, however, the writing is on the wall. Amazon is
trying to save itself from the surrounding morass of state issues by
now appealing to decidedly better interests by supporting a higher law
of the land, at the federal level, for a governing tax guideline
applicable and encompassing to all states. It may not be happening
until, according to how political agendas are rated, 2014, and
ramifications from such as EBAY remain as yet partial and antagonistic
uncertainties.

I could see it being crafted in a manner similar to the apportioned
registration of fleet vehicles or like the way the International Fuel
Tax Agreement is written and administered, with registration/tax
certification being the responsibility of the tax-liable entity in the
state of its domicile and the state distributing proceeds to sister
states into which sales are made. That would keep the feds' fingers out
of the pie, which is desirable to some people, and bring more certainty
to consumers regarding the applicable rate for a given incident of
taxation. Naturally, obviously, there'd be the burden of record keeping
for internet merchants and the risk of administrative and, perhaps,
criminal prosecution for failing to comply but if you go into business,
you go into business, not some past time you do out of boredom.

The eBay (and, probably, Amazon) individuals who list and sell things
once in awhile and aren't in the concerted effort to make a living
selling ought to be taken out of the taxation model, in my opinion, and
treated as persons making isolated or occasional sales not subject to
tax collection responsibilities.

Next on the horizon, the native American tribe(s) who get the idea to go
into the server hosting business on designated reservations and offer
customers a haven from the imposition of sales tax collection.

LNC
 
They're after a consistent regulatory tax bases, not one for NY and
another for CA. At the time of exemptions, it was deemed too imposing
for an online merchant to bear an onus of recording and imposing every
state's tax vagaries. "Brick and Mortar" merchants, with a specific
state presence and business infrastructure, were the exceptions. With
nearly a decade since past and the economy compounded and presently in
Hell's Handbasket, however, the writing is on the wall. Amazon is
trying to save itself from the surrounding morass of state issues by
now appealing to decidedly better interests by supporting a higher law
of the land, at the federal level, for a governing tax guideline
applicable and encompassing to all states. It may not be happening
until, according to how political agendas are rated, 2014, and
ramifications from such as EBAY remain as yet partial and antagonistic
uncertainties.

Last I read was that EBAY was exempted from charging sales taxes in
Calif. Probably Amazon need to become an "EBAY seller"?
 
On 11/23/2011 8:23 AM, Flasherly wrote:

I could see it being crafted in a manner similar to the apportioned
registration of fleet vehicles or like the way the International Fuel
Tax Agreement is written and administered, with registration/tax
certification being the responsibility of the tax-liable entity in the
state of its domicile and the state distributing proceeds to sister
states into which sales are made. That would keep the feds' fingers out
of the pie, which is desirable to some people, and bring more certainty
to consumers regarding the applicable rate for a given incident of
taxation. Naturally, obviously, there'd be the burden of record keeping
for internet merchants and the risk of administrative and, perhaps,
criminal prosecution for failing to comply but if you go into business,
you go into business, not some past time you do out of boredom.

The eBay (and, probably, Amazon) individuals who list and sell things
once in awhile and aren't in the concerted effort to make a living
selling ought to be taken out of the taxation model, in my opinion, and
treated as persons making isolated or occasional sales not subject to
tax collection responsibilities.

Next on the horizon, the native American tribe(s) who get the idea to go
into the server hosting business on designated reservations and offer
customers a haven from the imposition of sales tax collection.

Who knows, although I'm not so sure individualism at the forefront of
the Information Age is relevant to presaging a populist viewpoint
surrounded by business structures representing predominately an appeal
and omnibus for states pressed by income for a fairer distribution
model. Sovereign rights of the tribal territories are stated within
conditional restrictions of a tentative nature tradition has carried
by tokens, perhaps similar to an elective of Populists in tents
surrounding the forefront of quasi-states at Occupy Wall Street, for
whom, erected tents form vestal protection from, most certainly, a
veritable deluge of champagne threatening to inundating them, when
capitalists en masse raise a collective glass by way of appreciation
to applaud their noble sentiment.
 
Back
Top