Hi Trab,
Thanks for update!
Please understand that our newsgroup is an issue based service, meaning we
usually respond to one question/issue per post. This will lessen the
confusion for both of us, as well as ensure that our results are accurate
and not a result of a test for a different question. Therefore, regarding
the issue, I suggest you open a new post so that the dedicated MS engineer
can help you on it in a more efficient manner. Thanks for your
understanding and support!
Thanks & Regards,
Jason Tan
Microsoft Online Partner Support
Get Secure! -
www.microsoft.com/security
=====================================================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
=====================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--------------------
| Thread-Topic: Oplocks
| thread-index: AcVUmUN0CvmuoztyTq+iRlLHkKYGbw==
| X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 81.72.203.38
| From: "=?Utf-8?B?dHJhYg==?=" <
[email protected]>
| References: <
[email protected]>
<
[email protected]>
<
[email protected]>
<HR7y#
[email protected]>
| Subject: RE: Oplocks
| Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 06:16:08 -0700
| Lines: 227
| Message-ID: <
[email protected]>
| MIME-Version: 1.0
| Content-Type: text/plain;
| charset="Utf-8"
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
| X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
| Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
| Importance: normal
| Priority: normal
| X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
| Newsgroups: microsoft.public.win2000.networking
| NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
| Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
| Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.win2000.networking:23763
| X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.win2000.networking
|
| Hi Jason,
| Since you are glad, here is a more specific scenario from one of my
| customers. ;-)
|
| 2-nodes cluster, Windows 2003 Adv. Server hosting:
| - Exchange Server 2003
| - users home directories
| - user profiles
| - file share for obsolete database application
|
| Are you aware of problems while setting these parameters on each cluster
| node?
|
| Thanks.
|
| Trab
|
| P.S. About my original confusion: you can understand I was a bit
perplexed
| in reading to set LanmanServer\Parameters on clients too...
|
|
|
| "Jason Tan (MSFT)" wrote:
|
| >
| > Hi Trab,
| >
| > Thanks for your update soon!
| >
| > If you have any concerns or questions, please feel free to let me know.
I
| > am glad to be of assistance!
| >
| > Thanks & Regards,
| >
| > Jason Tan
| >
| > Microsoft Online Partner Support
| > Get Secure! -
www.microsoft.com/security
| >
| > =====================================================
| >
| > When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader
so
| > that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
| >
| > =====================================================
| > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
| >
| >
| > --------------------
| > | Thread-Topic: Oplocks
| > | thread-index: AcVUctT4wZBPOls7QUKpVW1tzqy77A==
| > | X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 81.72.203.38
| > | From: "=?Utf-8?B?dHJhYg==?=" <
[email protected]>
| > | References: <
[email protected]>
| > <
[email protected]>
| > | Subject: RE: Oplocks
| > | Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 01:41:02 -0700
| > | Lines: 131
| > | Message-ID: <
[email protected]>
| > | MIME-Version: 1.0
| > | Content-Type: text/plain;
| > | charset="Utf-8"
| > | Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
| > | X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
| > | Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
| > | Importance: normal
| > | Priority: normal
| > | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
| > | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.win2000.networking
| > | NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
| > | Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
| > | Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.win2000.networking:23760
| > | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.win2000.networking
| > |
| > | Thanks, all seems clear in your answer. In case of more doubts I'll
| > surely
| > | let you know!
| > |
| > | Trab
| > |
| > | "Jason Tan (MSFT)" wrote:
| > |
| > | > Hi,
| > | >
| > | > Thanks for posting!
| > | >
| > | > I would like to make some clarification on the description here.
| > | >
| > | > You may refer to Q296264 to configure opportunistic locking on both
| > client
| > | > and server as the following:
| > | >
| > | >
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\MRXSmb\Parameters\
| > | >
| > | > Or to set entry EnableOplocks to 0 this one:
| > | >
| > | >
| >
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanServer\Parameters
| > | >
| > | >
| > | > Additionally, you may refer to following to improve performance
when an
| > | > application locks data and then immediately reads the data, or
writes
| > data
| > | > and then immediately unlocks it.
| > | >
| > | > UseLockReadUnlock
| > | >
| >
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/Windows/2000/server/reskit/
| > | >
| >
en-us/Default.asp?url=/resources/documentation/Windows/2000/server/reskit/en
| > | > -us/regentry/58913.asp
| > | >
| > | > However, Q 219022 is only applied to Microsoft BackOffice Small
| > Business
| > | > Server 4.0 and Microsoft BackOffice Small Business Server 4.5. It
| > cannot
| > | > apply to Windows 2000 environment here.
| > | >
| > | > If there is anything that is unclear, please feel free to let me
know.
| > | >
| > | > Thanks & Regards,
| > | >
| > | > Jason Tan
| > | >
| > | > Microsoft Online Partner Support
| > | > Get Secure! -
www.microsoft.com/security
| > | >
| > | > =====================================================
| > | >
| > | > When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your
newsreader
| > so
| > | > that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
| > | >
| > | > =====================================================
| > | > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
| > rights.
| > | >
| > | >
| > | >
| > | > --------------------
| > | > | Thread-Topic: Oplocks
| > | > | thread-index: AcVTH4ERbRk89DVITs2EQiQGA44Upg==
| > | > | X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 81.72.203.38
| > | > | From: "=?Utf-8?B?dHJhYg==?=" <
[email protected]>
| > | > | Subject: Oplocks
| > | > | Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 09:12:02 -0700
| > | > | Lines: 38
| > | > | Message-ID: <
[email protected]>
| > | > | MIME-Version: 1.0
| > | > | Content-Type: text/plain;
| > | > | charset="Utf-8"
| > | > | Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
| > | > | X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
| > | > | Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
| > | > | Importance: normal
| > | > | Priority: normal
| > | > | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
| > | > | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.win2000.networking
| > | > | NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
| > | > | Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
| > | > | Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
microsoft.public.win2000.networking:23739
| > | > | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.win2000.networking
| > | > |
| > | > | (this is a repost: sorry, e-mail alias in previous post was wrong)
| > | > |
| > | > | Hi all,
| > | > | I have question about the known issue of opportunistic locking
for
| > old
| > | > | database applications running with obsolete engines (Superbase
and
| > | > Paradox,
| > | > | the problem is very similar). Client-server apps, Windows 2000
| > | > (up-to-date
| > | > | with SPs and critical updates) both client and server.
| > | > |
| > | > | I have found the first official answer in "296264: Configure
| > | > opportunistic
| > | > | locking in Windows". The suggestion is to set entry
OplocksDisabled
| > to 1
| > | > in
| > | > | this client registry entry:
| > | > |
| > | > |
| > HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\MRXSmb\Parameters\
| > | > |
| > | > | or to set entry EnableOplocks to 0 this one:
| > | > |
| > | > |
| > | >
| >
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanServer\Parameters
| > | >
| > | > |
| > | > | More infos are in "219022: Improving Performance of MS-DOS
Database
| > | > | Applications" about in particular entry EnableOpLocks, in
| > | > |
| > | > |
| > | >
| >
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanServer\Parameters
| > | >
| > | > |
| > | > | Good. BUT in Windows 2000 Registry Reference, at
| > | >
| >
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/Windows/2000/server/reskit/
| > | >
| >
en-us/Default.asp?url=/resources/documentation/Windows/2000/server/reskit/en
| > | > -us/regentry/58913.asp
| > | > |
| > | > | I've found more registry entries, UseLockReadUnlock and
| > | > | UseOpportunisticLocking,
| > | > | in this registry key:
| > | > |
| > | > |
HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanWorkstation\Parameters
| > | > |
| > | > | So, I'm getting a bit confused. Which entries are to be set for
| > better
| > | > | performance? I've got to set them on client computer, on server
| > computer
| > | > or
| > | > | both?!
| > | > |
| > | > | Thanks.
| > | > |
| > | > |
| > | >
| > | >
| > |
| >
| >
|
