Hi Trab,
Thanks for update!
You are welcome to post back if you have any questions or concerns. We are
always to be of assistance!
Thanks & Regards,
Jason Tan
Microsoft Online Partner Support
Get Secure! -
www.microsoft.com/security
=====================================================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
=====================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--------------------
| Thread-Topic: Oplocks and cluster
| thread-index: AcVYn1liywBTlBroRE+xLdHyUZB8bg==
| X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 81.72.203.38
| From: "=?Utf-8?B?dHJhYg==?=" <
[email protected]>
| References: <
[email protected]>
<
[email protected]>
| Subject: RE: Oplocks and cluster
| Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 09:09:47 -0700
| Lines: 87
| Message-ID: <
[email protected]>
| MIME-Version: 1.0
| Content-Type: text/plain;
| charset="Utf-8"
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
| X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
| Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
| Importance: normal
| Priority: normal
| X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
| Newsgroups: microsoft.public.win2000.networking
| NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
| Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
| Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.win2000.networking:23891
| X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.win2000.networking
|
| Hi Jason,
| Your answer seems clear, thanks. The IT manager of my customer has been
| notified, maybe we'll try soon these settings.
|
| Trab
|
|
| "Jason Tan (MSFT)" wrote:
|
| > Hi,
| >
| > Thanks for posting!
| >
| > Based on my research, I did not notice that there is any problem with
such
| > configuration. I believe that the behavior is same on a non-clustered
| > server. That is, if EnableOpLocks=0 is needed on a non-clustered server
in
| > this situation, then you need to set it on both nodes on a cluster.
Because
| > you have a file share for obsolete database application, the setting is
| > recommended. UseLockReadUnlock is a client-side setting. It does not
care
| > if the server is clustered or not.
| >
| > If there is anything that is unclear, please feel free to let me know.
| >
| > Thanks & Regards,
| >
| > Jason Tan
| >
| > Microsoft Online Partner Support
| > Get Secure! -
www.microsoft.com/security
| >
| > =====================================================
| >
| > When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader
so
| > that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
| >
| > =====================================================
| > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
| >
| > --------------------
| > | Thread-Topic: Oplocks and cluster
| > | thread-index: AcVVTS5h5lC6dlt/Sn+gyYDXajVpfw==
| > | X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 62.101.95.216
| > | From: "=?Utf-8?B?dHJhYg==?=" <
[email protected]>
| > | Subject: Oplocks and cluster
| > | Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 03:44:02 -0700
| > | Lines: 21
| > | Message-ID: <
[email protected]>
| > | MIME-Version: 1.0
| > | Content-Type: text/plain;
| > | charset="Utf-8"
| > | Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
| > | X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
| > | Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
| > | Importance: normal
| > | Priority: normal
| > | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
| > | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.win2000.networking
| > | NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
| > | Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
| > | Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.win2000.networking:23785
| > | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.win2000.networking
| > |
| > | (following my previous thread Subj "Oplocks" 5/7/2005)
| > |
| > | I know I can refer to Q296264 for opportunistic locking
configuration
| > for
| > | old database application running with obsolete engines (Superbase and
| > | Paradox).
| > | Here is a complex scenario from one of my customers:
| > |
| > | 2-nodes cluster, Windows 2003 Adv. Server hosting:
| > | - Exchange Server 2003
| > | - users home directories
| > | - user profiles
| > | - file share for obsolete database application
| > |
| > | Is anyone aware of problems in such a configuration, while setting
| > | parameters MRXSmb or EnableOpLocks on each cluster node, or while
tuning
| > | performance with UseLockReadUnlock parameter?
| > |
| > | Thanks.
| > |
| > | Trab
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
|
