Open source or dotnet?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Leon_Amirreza
  • Start date Start date
L

Leon_Amirreza

we can have win32 platform but
arent dot net programs very hacker friendly?
any much difference between a dotnet program and an open source program?!
 
You can write insecure code with any tool and any langauge. If used
correctly .NET is very safe and in many instance, much safer than unmanaged
code.

It depends on what you mean by difference. .NET isn't open source so that's
one difference. (Mono however will have an open source version)
I guess if you can tell me what aspect of open source you want to compare it
to, I can address that specifically.

HTH,

Bill

www.devbuzz.com
www.knowdotnet.com
 
Leon_Amirreza said:
we can have win32 platform but
arent dot net programs very hacker friendly?
any much difference between a dotnet program and an open source program?!

This "problem" is very over-stated IMHO. You're deluding yourself if
you think that "native compiled" apps aren't easily decompiled and
studied. Does it really matter if .net apps are "really easy" to do
it to rather than "just easy"?
 
just to say that i agree with u in that with a good debuuger or decomplier
tool there will be no much difference in .net or win32 programs and u said
its overstated maybe becausae of I havent studied about this much. if u can
possibly give me some site (or doc, page especially published by Microdsoft)
addresses that contains deeper discussions in that?

and by opensource i meant its easy to study the programs source not the
licensing
I thought my previus post would say the point that actually didnt
any way thank you for yur time
 
Back
Top