T
Tony Norton
Well, O.K., I can probably answer the "Why?" myself, to make more money of
course. With a global recession on us Bill must down his last few $Billion,
but what really puzzles me is the "How?".
In the old days of DOS based programs on 5.25" floppy disks (remember those?
No? Then your probably not old enough) software writers installed on the
floppy a file that got moved to the harddrive on which the software was
installed, effectively making it impossible(?) for the average Joe to install
it on a second PC unless....... it was un-installed from the first PC when
the 'key' file was moved back to the floppy. This I understand and was a
perfectly legal and understandable way of enforcing copyright.
But, assuming the OS (say, XP Pro 64X) is installed from a CD-R, not a
CD-R/W no info can be taken from the Mobo to write to the disk. True a 'key'
file could possibly be erased on installation (but I can't see how on a
CD-R), but if a backup copy is burnt before installation (CD-R to CD-R/W),
then either of the 2 resultant disks could, in theory, be used to do an
installation, or couldn't they? I know this could well constitute software
piracy, but I'm talking practicalities here, not legalities. Why shouldn't I
keep a backup of my OS in case the original gets lost or trodden on?
If it does it by poking it's nose into my BIOS then any info resting therein
would be overwritten by an update of the BIOS. If so I can see it being
possible that my PC would no longer work, raising the question "What right
have Microsoft to mess about with my hardware platform?".
I fully understand the legalities of this 'once only' installation, does
anybody understand the mechanics? If I am prepared to un-install my OS prior
to an upgrade or purchasing a new PC, why shouldn't I be able to re-install
it. If I have purchased it, I have paid for a licence to use the software on
one PC, not a specific PC to be defined and controlled by Microsoft.
'Big Brother' is alive and well and living in the US of A. George Orwell
only got the date wrong!
course. With a global recession on us Bill must down his last few $Billion,
but what really puzzles me is the "How?".
In the old days of DOS based programs on 5.25" floppy disks (remember those?
No? Then your probably not old enough) software writers installed on the
floppy a file that got moved to the harddrive on which the software was
installed, effectively making it impossible(?) for the average Joe to install
it on a second PC unless....... it was un-installed from the first PC when
the 'key' file was moved back to the floppy. This I understand and was a
perfectly legal and understandable way of enforcing copyright.
But, assuming the OS (say, XP Pro 64X) is installed from a CD-R, not a
CD-R/W no info can be taken from the Mobo to write to the disk. True a 'key'
file could possibly be erased on installation (but I can't see how on a
CD-R), but if a backup copy is burnt before installation (CD-R to CD-R/W),
then either of the 2 resultant disks could, in theory, be used to do an
installation, or couldn't they? I know this could well constitute software
piracy, but I'm talking practicalities here, not legalities. Why shouldn't I
keep a backup of my OS in case the original gets lost or trodden on?
If it does it by poking it's nose into my BIOS then any info resting therein
would be overwritten by an update of the BIOS. If so I can see it being
possible that my PC would no longer work, raising the question "What right
have Microsoft to mess about with my hardware platform?".
I fully understand the legalities of this 'once only' installation, does
anybody understand the mechanics? If I am prepared to un-install my OS prior
to an upgrade or purchasing a new PC, why shouldn't I be able to re-install
it. If I have purchased it, I have paid for a licence to use the software on
one PC, not a specific PC to be defined and controlled by Microsoft.
'Big Brother' is alive and well and living in the US of A. George Orwell
only got the date wrong!