B
Brian via AccessMonster.com
I have converted a database from 97 to 2003. I have been getting an error
message related to OLE in the 2003 version that does not happen in 97.
However, I do not believe it is related to the conversion.
I have a subform the contains an OLE field which may or may not contain
data depending on the record. When you have focus on the bound object frame
for the OLE and it is empty then move to a different subform or main form,
it acts as though you have double clicked and want to edit the object. You
then receive the following message:
The OLE object is empty.
You can't edit a bound object frame if the field in the underlying table
doesn't contain an OLE object.
Embed or link an OLE object into the bound object frame using......
I have checked the events for both the subform and the frame. there is
nothing that should cause this to happen.
Any thoughts would help!!!
P.S.
If you move to an object within the same subform you do not get the error
message.
Thanks,
Brian
message related to OLE in the 2003 version that does not happen in 97.
However, I do not believe it is related to the conversion.
I have a subform the contains an OLE field which may or may not contain
data depending on the record. When you have focus on the bound object frame
for the OLE and it is empty then move to a different subform or main form,
it acts as though you have double clicked and want to edit the object. You
then receive the following message:
The OLE object is empty.
You can't edit a bound object frame if the field in the underlying table
doesn't contain an OLE object.
Embed or link an OLE object into the bound object frame using......
I have checked the events for both the subform and the frame. there is
nothing that should cause this to happen.
Any thoughts would help!!!
P.S.
If you move to an object within the same subform you do not get the error
message.
Thanks,
Brian