Hello, JunkMonkey!
You wrote on Sun, 05 Oct 2003 15:40:33 GMT:
J> (Star Office is just Open Office with user support added from Sun, and
J> some useful conversion filters where the rights to use them have to be
J> paid for. Minor stuff mostly The idea is to create a product that will
J> make corporate buyers comfortable.)
J> I also consider myself to be quite knowledgeable about Microsoft Office
J> and WordPerfect Suite, and I consider myself comfortable with IBM's
J> Lotus SmartSuite. I'm also quite fond of Microsoft Works, an under-rated
J> contender for the small office/home business, IMHO.
J> To sum up my findings, it's a mixed bag of goodies.
J> From what I can tell, the word processor and spreadsheet are quite good.
J> Easily the equal of anything on the market today. They are a bit
J> sluggish compared the big three (Well, the big One and the medium sized
J> two), but my understanding is that Open Office is interpreted Java
J> source, so the speed is good, considering. At any rate, they were fast
J> enough not to cause me any frustration and that's all that counts. From
J> an operational POV,I would give them a grade of A-, it would have been
J> higher if the speed were equal to WordPerfect and QuattroPro.
J> I didn't use the presentation software. But I don't know why that is
J> considered a part of a basic office suite anyway. In my opinion that is
J> specialized software.
J> There is no PIM included. No Outlook, no Lotus Calendar (the best there
J> is, I think), or even a miserable version of Corel's PIM (Sorry, the
J> name escapes me). Grade of F for not even trying, A well integrated PIM
J> is an important part of a serious office suite if you intend to use it
J> for business.
J> The database element is just miserable. From the documentation, my
J> understanding is that Open Office dropped the database portion of the
J> suite for a front end application that allows you to connect to third
J> party database engines. StarOffice added a crippled version of ADABAS.
J> I couldn't get either one to work (that's pretty crippled IMO), and I
J> consider myself rather knowledgeable about databases, I'm a Certified
J> Teradata Professional, and I've worked professionally with DB/2,
J> Teradata, Oracle, Progress, MS Access, and Paradox. After 3 or 4 days,
J> I gave up in frustration. And I had tried to connect to Access and
J> Paradox using the front end. The database is NOT ready for the office.
J> For the office, stuff needs to work right out of the box with no time
J> wasted. Grade: Don't even bother.
J> On the whole, the suite is NOT ready to run a business with, though I
J> think Sun is on the right track by adding the little extra stuff to Open
J> Office that have to be there to make a viable office suite. But if all
J> you need is a good word processor and/or spreadsheet, you should
J> seriously consider this suite. I think somebody already said, 'The
J> price is right!"
J> ??>> I am looking for an alternative to Microsoft. I'd like to know which
??>> of these programs you prefer. I downloaded open office yesterday and
??>> it
J> seems
??>> pretty good although a little slow. How does it compare to the other
??>> program?
??>> Thanks in advance.
??>>
To add some comments by someone who has used both and gotten feedback from a
client:
OpenOffice just barely beat out Easy Office on my "Best of Freeware" site
(shameless plug)
http://home.wi.rr.com/johnhood/freeware/ because of a
larger range of compatability, and ease of use. The presenter in EasyOffice
is NOT something I'd use for business presentations. EasyOffice does not
have a PIM per se. but does have a built in contacts manager with history.
There is also a database componant with wizard. EasyOffice's tech support
is very good, the spreadsheet program has rebuilt reports for cash flow, AP
and AR, etc.Even if OO is better all around. EasyOffice is a
"First-runner-up".
With best regards, John H.. E-mail: (e-mail address removed)