Questions regarding OEM licensing are addressed in the
OEM system builders newsgroup:
http://www.microsoft.com/oem/default.mspx
"Generally, you may upgrade or replace all of the hardware components on
your customer's computer and the end user may maintain the license for the
original Microsoft OEM operating system software, with the exception of an
upgrade or replacement of the motherboard. An upgrade of the motherboard is
considered to result in a "new personal computer" to which Microsoft OEM
operating system software cannot be transferred from another computer. If
the motherboard is upgraded or replaced for reasons other than a defect,
then a new computer has been created and the license of new operating system
software is required. If the motherboard is replaced because it is
defective, you do NOT need to acquire a new operating system license for the
PC as long as the replacement motherboard is the same make/model or the same
manufacturer's replacement/equivalent, as defined by the manufacturer's
warranty.
The reason for this licensing rule primarily relates to the end-user license
agreement (EULA) and the support of the software covered by that EULA. The
EULA is a set of usage rights granted to the end-user by the PC manufacturer
and relates only to rights for that software as installed on for that
particular PC. The System Builder is required to support the software on
that original PC. Understanding that end users, over time, upgrade their PC
with different components, Microsoft needed to have one base component "left
standing" that would still define that original PC. Since the motherboard
contains the CPU and is the "heart and soul" of the PC, when the motherboard
is replaced (for reasons other than defect) a new PC is essentially created.
The original System Builder, therefore, can not be expected to support this
new PC that they in effect, did not manufacture."
--
Carey Frisch
Microsoft MVP
Windows - Shell/User
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
:
in message
Rick said:
Again, yes, that is the intent.
Rick, not being confrontational, but do you have a source for this? I
haven't been able to get hold of a OEM EULA anywhere, which presumably
is where this would be stated.
Such a restriction would almost certainly be unlawful under EC
regulations, given that a motherboard can fail within weeks of
powering-up and such a restriction would effectively be unfair to both
the consumer and the builder.
If I were to buy a PC from a systems builder which had an OEM Vista
o/s, and the motherboard failed within 12 months I would have the right
to demand that the motherboard be replaced and that the supplier would
bear the cost. In that case surely the supplier would not be forced to
pay for another copy of the o/s from Microsoft?