Sometimes I top post, like this.
| Robert Schumacher wrote:
| >
|
| <snip>
|
| > If you want to "fix" Outlook Express so that it properly
bottom-posts
| > and does correct quoting/sig snipping, etc., consider
| >
http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/
| >
| > Freeware, and once configured OE pretty much behaves like a
normal
| > newsreader.
|
And sometimes, I add a comment inside the earlier post, like
this.
| What a great little prog.
|
And sometimes, I put stuff after the last poster ends, like this.
Cool, huh.
BTW, I'm using Quote Fix as we speak. I could swear that it has
been causing some sorrt of memory problem on my box; there are
minor conflicts (Windows Me and maxed-out memory).
Regarding top/bottom posting, I present a reality check:
- When my contribution is very brief, I'll put it at the top. Who
cannot agree that it's a royal bummer to slog all the way through
a long essay just to get all the way to the end where the new
post adds, "Cool!." Putting that grunt at the top saves us all a
lot of time and effort.
- Extending the discussion with any reasonable content: this
makes sense as bottom stuff.
"Do You Yahoo,?" however, should always go at the bottom because
subjecting other people to Yahoo's advertisements really sucks.
Yahoo sucks.
Richard